Did you expect anything else? I still wouldnt pay that price though, as great as
this car may be, i didnt see the lap, but a normal wet lap is about 4s different
than a dry 1.
I also have not seen that episode, but a VERY wet lap, like the Alfa 8C, is 8s
of a wet lap, a Wet lap, like that of the Viper SRT-10, is comparable to 4s, a
wet/damp lap is comparable to 2-3s, a damp lap, is comparable to 1/12s, BUT,
this also depends on the tyre size/style/ and drivetrain, for instance, if a car
has semi slicks, like a R26R or CSL, it would do much worse than a car with tyes
like a ZO6, and a 4wd car will do a Much better time than a rwd and fwd car in
the wet, BUT, thats not alwasy the case. but given the Perfromace of the LF-A, i
would say in a perfect dry lap, with the Stig Actually pushing it, i would have
to guess a 1:18.5, but again, i didnt see the video, so i cnat be sure of my
estimates on the lap, since its counted as a wet lap.
probably the hammerhead was the only moist part of the track.. after the lap
Hammond said that it was a very wet lap. well not all parts of the track i
guess.. so less 3-4s? Dang! A dry lap time is needed urgent!
it was no very wet lap no matter what Hamster said.. I guess we all have eyes
and see there is a big different between a realy very wet lap shown from the
NSX-R Powerlap and the mildely moist lap of the LF-A
As bumrush claimed befor the LF-a is possible up to 4seconds quicker in a
perfect condition lap(I guess more realistic are ~3s)..but no way it could lap
the track 6s quicker, that would be quicker than a Apollo thats impossible for
the LF-A
Well for 350k if i were rich i buy it no question ask. Doesn't matter if it was
a little slower its still damn fast. But I think toyota's choosing the buyers.
Not just that people think its over price but it really isn't, only 500 will be
produced and not just that if you have one you have one of 500. Thats like
saying, "I own a lexus lfa do you?"