Audi RS6 vs Audi RS5
Category | Audi RS5 (9T) | Audi RS6 |
---|---|---|
Engine layout | 2.9 l V6 | 4.0 l V8 |
Max power (ps / bhp) | 450 / 444 | 560 / 552 |
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 600 / 443 | 700 / 516 |
Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1739 / 3834 | 1986 / 4378 |
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 259 / 255 | 282 / 278 |
Average price | €99,000 | €131,000 |
Lap Times
Track | Audi RS5 (9T) | Audi RS6 |
---|---|---|
Hockenheim Short | 1:14.00 | 1:13.70 |
Sachsenring | 1:37.98 | 1:39.51 |
Balocco | 2:51.19 | 2:51.61 |
Acceleration
Speed & distance | Audi RS5 (9T) | Audi RS6 |
---|---|---|
0 - 40 kph | 1.1 s | 1.2 s |
0 - 100 kph | 3.5 s | 3.5 s |
0 - 130 kph | 5.6 s | 5.4 s |
0 - 160 kph | 8.4 s | 8.0 s |
0 - 180 kph | 10.5 s | 9.8 s |
0 - 200 kph | 12.9 s | 12.1 s |
1000 m | 21.7 s | 21.6 s |
0 - 60 mph | 3.5 s | 3.6 s |
0 - 100 mph | 8.6 s | 7.7 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.3 s @ 101.3 mph | 8.2 s @ 102.5 mph |
1/4 mile | 11.5 s | 11.6 s @ 122.4 mph |
Rolling acceleration
Speed | Audi RS5 (9T) | Audi RS6 |
---|---|---|
80 - 120 kph (4) | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 3.3 s | 3.8 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 4.6 s | 5.5 s |
80 - 120 kph (7) | 6.2 s | 7.9 s |
80 - 120 kph (8) | 12.0 s | 14.0 s |
80 - 160 kph (5) | 7.0 s | 7.8 s |
80 - 160 kph (6) | 10.0 s | 10.8 s |
80 - 160 kph (7) | 13.4 s | 15.0 s |
80 - 160 kph (8) | 21.8 s | 26.3 s |
80 - 120 kph | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 10.0 s | 8.9 s |
General performance
Category | Audi RS5 (9T) | Audi RS6 |
---|---|---|
Top speed | 290 kph (180 mph) | 305 kph (190 mph) |
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 15.3 s @ 1289 ft | 12.1 s @ 843 ft |
Est. max acceleration | 0.85 g (8 m/s²) | 0.84 g (8 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 70.6 kph (43.9 mph) | 67.1 kph (41.7 mph) |
Fuel economy | 7.2 l/100 km (33 mpg US / 39 UK) | 12.1 l/100 km (19 mpg US / 23 UK) |
100 kph - 0 | 33 m (108 ft) | 34 m (111 ft) |
200 kph - 0 | 134 m (440 ft) | 145 m (475 ft) |
Summary
Category | Audi RS5 (9T) | Audi RS6 |
---|---|---|
Track Performance | 100 | 99 |
Straight line speed | 90 | 100 |
Overall | 97 | 100 |
Verdict
RS6 is the fastest by a small margin.
This comparison has been viewed 1.2k times.