BAHAHAHAHA WTF IS THIS THERE IS NO WAY THAT AUDI IS FASTER
Pagani Zonda F vs Audi RS7 Sportback Performance
Category | Pagani Zonda F | RS7 Sportback |
---|---|---|
Engine layout | 7.3 l V12 | 4.0 l V8 |
Max power (ps / bhp) | 602 / 594 | 605 / 597 |
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 760 / 561 | 750 / 553 |
Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1371 / 3023 | 2023 / 4460 |
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 439 / 433 | 299 / 295 |
Average price | €631,000 | €137,000 |
Lap Times
Track | Pagani Zonda F | RS7 Sportback |
---|---|---|
Hockenheim Short | 1:10.80 | 1:12.60 |
Acceleration
Speed & distance | Pagani Zonda F | RS7 Sportback |
---|---|---|
0 - 40 kph | 1.3 s | 1.2 s |
0 - 60 kph | 2.0 s | 1.7 s |
0 - 80 kph | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
0 - 100 kph | 3.8 s | 3.3 s |
0 - 120 kph | 4.9 s | 4.4 s |
0 - 140 kph | 6.3 s | 5.6 s |
0 - 160 kph | 7.7 s | 7.0 s |
0 - 180 kph | 9.1 s | 8.7 s |
0 - 200 kph | 11.4 s | 10.6 s |
0 - 100 mph | 7.7 s | 7.2 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.1 s @ 105.0 mph | 7.8 s @ 104.4 mph |
Rolling acceleration
Speed | Pagani Zonda F | RS7 Sportback |
---|---|---|
80 - 120 kph (4) | 3.3 s | 2.8 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 4.2 s | 3.5 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
80 - 160 kph (4) | 6.4 s | 5.7 s |
80 - 160 kph (5) | 8.5 s | 7.4 s |
80 - 160 kph (6) | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
Est. 100 - 140 kph | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 7.6 s | 7.9 s |
General performance
Category | Pagani Zonda F | RS7 Sportback |
---|---|---|
Top speed | 345 kph (214 mph) | 305 kph (190 mph) |
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 11.3 s @ 801 ft | 11.9 s @ 876 ft |
Est. max acceleration | 0.81 g (8 m/s²) | 0.91 g (9 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 72.1 kph (44.8 mph) | 66.8 kph (41.5 mph) |
36m slalom | 137.0 kph (85.1 mph) | 126.7 kph (78.7 mph) |
Fuel economy | 19.8 l/100 km (12 mpg US / 14 UK) | 11.0 l/100 km (21 mpg US / 26 UK) |
100 kph - 0 | 32 m (104 ft) | 34 m (110 ft) |
200 kph - 0 | 122 m (402 ft) | 137 m (450 ft) |
Summary
Category | Pagani Zonda F | RS7 Sportback |
---|---|---|
Track Performance | 100 | 93 |
Straight line speed | 89 | 100 |
Overall | 100 | 100 |
Verdict
There is no clear winner in this comparison.
This comparison has been viewed 740 times.