Doesn't seem a huge difference maybe considerable.
Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Super Sport vs Rimac Nevera
| Category | Veyron 16.4 Super | Rimac Nevera |
|---|---|---|
| Max power (ps / bhp) | 1199 / 1183 | 1941 / 1914 |
| Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 1500 / 1106 | 2299 / 1696 |
| Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1992 / 4392 | 2150 / 4740 |
| Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 602 / 594 | 903 / 890 |
Performance
| Category | Veyron 16.4 Super | Rimac Nevera |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 100 kph | 2.5 s | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 6.7 s | 4.4 s |
| 0 - 300 kph | 14.6 s | 9.2 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 2.4 s | 1.7 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 4.9 s | 3.2 s |
| 0 - 200 mph | 22.2 s | 10.9 s |
| 1/4 mile | 9.9 s @ 146.0 mph | 8.2 s |
| Top speed | 434 kph (270 mph) | 415 kph (258 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 1.09 g (11 m/s²) | 1.52 g (15 m/s²) |
Summary
| Category | Veyron 16.4 Super | Rimac Nevera |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 0 | 0 |
| Straight line speed | 44 | 100 |
| Overall | 44 | 100 |
Verdict
Nevera is the fastest by a huge margin.
This comparison has been viewed 1.3k times.
Acceleration graph
jeremyclarkson1 1m ago @GTR35
oh makes sense, and yeah i wish i could experience the launch in it, after seeing Mat Watson launch it and seeing his reaction 😂
jeremyclarkson1 1m ago @GTR35
yeah but i guess at the end of the day bugatti never really wanted to let magazines and such test it, especially with it costing over £1 million, but based on the koenigsegg ageras 0-300 time of 14.5 seconds im guessing the veyron does about 16?
