Image of Subaru Impreza WRX STI

Subaru Impreza WRX STI (2.5) specs

Price in US $35,640 - $37,440
Car type Compact
Curb weight 1526-1527 kg (3364-3366 lbs)
Introduced 2007
Origin country Japan
Gas mileage 13.8 l/100 km (17 mpg US / 20 mpg UK)
CO2 emissions 331 g/km
Views 104.8k
Submitted by Georg

Performance

0 - 50 kph1.6 s
0 - 100 kph5.6 s
0 - 200 kph22.4 s
1000 m25.1 s @ 209.0 kph
Est. 100 - 200 kph16.8 s
0 - 40 mph2.3 s
0 - 60 mph4.7 s
0 - 80 mph8.2 s
0 - 100 mph12.6 s
Est. 1/8 mile9.8 s @ 87.6 mph
1/4 mile13.3 s
Top speed255 kph (158 mph)
Est. max acceleration0.56 g (6 m/s²)
Lateral acceleration0.94 g (9 m/s²)
60 mph - 032 m (106 ft)
70 mph - 047 m (153 ft)
Subaru Impreza WRX STI acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type flat 4 turbo
Displacement 2.5 l (153 ci)
Power 300 ps (296 bhp / 221 kw) @ 6000 rpm
Torque 407 Nm (300 lb-ft) @ 4000 rpm
Power / liter 120 ps (119 hp)
Power / weight 197 ps (194 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 267 Nm (197 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 22 PS per l/100 km
Transmission 6 speed manual
Layout front engine, all wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

User avatar
User avatar

liverpool614  2y ago

Well, I'd like to add the 2024 Impreza, but I can't find the choice "2024" in Introduced year section. 🙃


User avatar

Shaggy  13y ago

Jeremy Clarkson from Top Gear said that the Subaru Impreza WRX STI looks like a smashed buttock, I think it looks pretty cool, myself.


User avatar

Michael  13y ago

@VW Veyron SS - yea, your buying a subaru, don't buy it for straight line speed.

A mustang GT/camaro SS cost less than this and that's why I'm looking at buying those. That being said, for the windy canyon road a subaru would def. be awesome.


User avatar

VW Veyron SS  14y ago

Waste of money for drag racing at this price. A 2002 Camaro Z28 or 2002 Trans Am WS6 will edge it out in the 1/4 mile and SMASH it in the standing mile and top speed.
If you take cars to a race track then it's a different story though.


User avatar

FastestLaps  14y ago

Did exactly the same lap time around Top Gear US track as BMW X6 M - 1:30.00


User avatar

CruzMargery  14y ago

A lot of specialists state that business loans aid a lot of people to live their own way, just because they can feel free to buy necessary things. Furthermore, some banks present short term loan for all people.


User avatar

anonymous  15y ago

quarter mile in 13.98 seconds @ 165.4 kph


User avatar

Swift  15y ago

I today have ran my 2006 STi with a VBOX GPS data logger. I ran 0-100km/h on RE070 stock tyres stock everything in 5.4 seconds with a launch at 4500 revs. Im sure that if I had done 2-3 more launches at 5000+ RPM I could reach a flat 5 second or less time for 0-100km/h...


User avatar

Anonymous  16y ago

^^
LoL..."1:22.40 very wet" for the GT2


User avatar

BumRush  16y ago

Simple reason, Wet Lap!


User avatar

steve__1979  16y ago

How can this be faster than a Porsche 997 GT2 but slower than a Renault Megane Sport at Bruntingthorp?


User avatar

Eglo  16y ago

Love this Subaru


User avatar

Anonymous  16y ago

1997 WRX better!
My dream car :)
http://nissat.tripod.com/Subaru_WRX_STi_Type_R_1997.html


User avatar

man man  16y ago

Watch the Top Gear episode again. The STi beat the EVO X, but they liked the EVO much better.


User avatar

RRRRRRRR  16y ago

this car sucks.


User avatar

akjndj  16y ago

Theres a mistake there
this car is slower than the evo x in the top gear track


User avatar

Sanswichman  16y ago

bought one 4 month ago. Blow-off valve, stage II, new exhaust System (thrust). accelerating is far behind that 4,4 (0-100) more than 5,5s. From 1st gear to 2nd it is ver slow and gives strange noises, and cannot make the 100km/h in second gear, so you have to put the 3rd... BUT not ugly, very nice, and I love it. Good car for 40k USD.


User avatar

Anonymous  16y ago

Subaru Impreza STi VS Mitsubishi lancer EVO X:

INTA (LONG and diferent TRACK):

Evo: 1 min 26,76 sec

STi: 1 min 26,74 sec

http://motor.terra.es/pruebas-coches/articulo/mitsubishi-lancer- evo-x-subaru-49063.htm

http://www.forocoches.com/foro/showthread.php?t=1317701&highligh t=


User avatar

Errol  16y ago

Which issue/month of Best motoring featured the 2.5L WRX STI in tsukuba? Was it a test vehicle? As far as i know, the 2.5L are only for export markets.



User avatar

Ulven  17y ago

Thank you. I only want to share
the test result because many people
are interest of this performance
data like me. I like this site and
I´m glad to help sometime.

Thanks again.


User avatar

Georg  17y ago

Ulven source and data are correct ... I have deleted that pointless blaming each other.


User avatar

Ulven  17y ago

Performance data from Auto motor und sport: 0-100 km/h 5,6 sec.
0-200 km/h 24,6 sec.


User avatar

Georg  17y ago

we have here 0-100km/h not 0-60mph


User avatar

Subpra  17y ago

Your 0-60 is off for the 08 STI. Search the Internet. Most reviews get mid to high 4's.


User avatar

Georg  17y ago

sportauto clocked disapointing 6.0s 0-100km/h but nearly reach the same 0-100mph/160km/h time... like the Evo X the WRX sTI fights with increased weight at the Hockenheimshorttrack..


User avatar

maestro  17y ago

be realistic. 0-100km can't be under five seconds with 194 hp/tone. even in a awd like this.


User avatar

Anonymous  17y ago

i think edmunds clocked 4.5 secs? not sure


User avatar

Georg  17y ago

Are there any 0-100km/h tests? Sportscars made a short test with the WRX STI ..the press car with the licens plate "FB-PR 314" missed factory claim 0-100km/h by whooping 0.6s .. sportscars was not able to get the car 0-100km/h in under 5.8s something they were realy disapointed about.