Image of Nissan GT-R Spec-V

Nissan GT-R Spec-V (R35) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1680 kg (3704 lbs)
Introduced 2009
Origin country Japan
Views 130.4k
Submitted by Chiesi

Lap times

Performance

0 - 100 kph3.2 s
0 - 200 kph13.3 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph10.1 s
Est. 0 - 60 mph3.0 s
0 - 100 mph8.4 s
Est. 1/8 mile7.9 s @ 103.8 mph
1/4 mile11.0 s @ 125.5 mph
Top speed305 kph (190 mph)
Est. max acceleration0.98 g (10 m/s²)
Nissan GT-R Spec-V acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type V6, Twin Turbo
Displacement 3.8 l (232 ci)
Power 486 ps (479 bhp / 357 kw)
Torque 632 Nm (466 lb-ft)
Power / liter 128 ps (126 hp)
Power / weight 289 ps (285 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 376 Nm (277 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 6
Layout front engine, all wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

User avatar
User avatar

Hoppelmoppel123  2y ago

@fastestlaps please change the power to 486 PS and the torque to 632 Nm


User avatar

benedekpuskas  4y ago

Why the 0-200 time is so slow? If the quarter-mile time is 11 sec at 125 mph, the 0-200 km/h time should be approximately 10.9-11 sec :/


User avatar

BR2+  11y ago

All the hype for this GT-R, And it didnt amount to shite.

This thing was all the rage when Nissan took the wraps off it, When there were teaser shots and camo GTRs, Lighter more hp, better for the track....Then it got a 5hp increase....60lbs less weight....and double the price tag of a base GTR, EVen eclipsing the Nismo price of todays GTR.

And only 3 laptimes?...Are you kidding me?..Man i was looking forward to this car with all the hype to, As a fan of Nissans (GT-R) series of cars, And proud owner of one for 12 years, I can say i was dissapointed badly.


User avatar

Shaggy  11y ago

@ Karthick01: Most likely not.


User avatar

Karthick01  11y ago

Is The 11 Second 1/4 mile For This Car is Correct ?.


User avatar

Hadyn  12y ago

Y'all think you know alot about cars but u really dont. So shut up all of y'all. Everyone of u is shit.


User avatar

joe stark  13y ago

spec-failed :)


User avatar

thybigballs  13y ago

Sorry, but if you search "GTR vs Corvette" on this site, you will see that out of 19 tracks the Corvette is faster on 14 of them. Thus, it is crystal clear who is faster on the straights AND the corners. Numbers don't lie.


User avatar

Winters  13y ago

ZR1 wins a drag race maybe. Going around corners? I think not.


User avatar

Sal  14y ago

Slow as hell!

ZR1 is KING!!!!


User avatar

Zenvo13  14y ago

It's slower than the standart GT-R?


User avatar

Mafalda  15y ago

GT-R Spec-V 492ps
2.46:000 @ Balocco (track in perfect condition)
0-100 Kph 3.73s
0-160 7.7s
1 Km 21.1 @ 253 Kph


User avatar

Eric  15y ago

looks like someone was trying to be cute with that 7.01 (very wet) Numbergring time.

Some one should remove that BS


User avatar

Marc99GT  15y ago

It has not run a 7:25 so people need to stop spreading internet rumors. The facts are what they are and crying about it doesn\'t help. I have never bought tht time on the Ring by the GTR and neither has most people. It has never been duplicated by anyone and the ZR1 beats the GTR on most other tracks around the world by several seconds, but on the longest track when it clearly is faster everywhere, it is that close? Makes no logical sense at all.


User avatar

Anonymouis.  15y ago

Hell no, the average customer isnt paying no 152k for a ZR1, your full of shit. and that 7:25 or whatever hasnt happened.


User avatar

VW Veyron SS  15y ago

The Spec-V has unofficially lapped the ring @ 7:25 and at 7:20.
It\'s certainly a faster car than the ZR1, but slower than the GT2RS, Gumpert Apollo Speed, and probably slower than the 599 GTO as well. The other thing is that it would actually sell for less than the ZR1 in the US if it were sold in the US.
Here\'s what Kelley Bluebook says are the REAL(not MSRP) prices the average consumer is paying for these cars.

911 Turbo $133,750,

ZR1 $152,782,

GTR $85,880,

Viper SRT-10 $96,681

Even the Spec-V would sell for less than the ZR1 if it were ever sold in the US becuase even a 370Z Nismo costs tons less in the US than in Japan.


User avatar

scooones  15y ago

@Bumrush that link is to a \"page not found\" page lol. I agree that is an impressive time though


User avatar

BumRush  15y ago

Might wanna check that Ring time.


User avatar

Sal  15y ago

170K for a Spec V and it is still slower than a ZR1???

LOL!!!!


User avatar

Sal  15y ago

170K for a Spec V and it is still slower than a ZR1???

LOL!!!!


User avatar

BumRush  15y ago

Source is right here.

http://www.gtchannel.com/video.php?video_id=61833

It is probably the most impresive time ever(Maybe) but figure the base GT-R does an 11.5 at 125mph, .5s off isnt that hard to believe, great traction, great tyres, fast dual clutch, but 170k is definetly PUSHING it! Japanese Supercars sure are expensive though.


User avatar

scooones  15y ago

i love this car, and for that ongoing war against the zr1, i would rather have this gt-r. no offence, and i do think the zr1 is an excellent piece of car (but very very sideways) but even i struggle with the idea of 11.0 quarter mile. the power to weight is still very poor. yes, the gt-r has a smart awd system, and transmission. but 11.0 is very quick. where is the source for that time btw?


User avatar

lol  15y ago

zr1 is crap...


User avatar

E  15y ago

I want someone to smoke comments like that.


User avatar

Anonymous  15y ago

ZR1 SMOKES SPEC V!!!!


User avatar

chevy47  15y ago

the zr1 beats this in performance. as a daily driver the gt-r wins, its personally i like the gt-r because of quality, comfort, and performance.


User avatar

Anonymous  15y ago

"the ZR1 still wins, sorry :( "

Haha, dream on kid.


User avatar

Cody  15y ago

the ZR1 still wins, sorry :(


User avatar

Sal is a dumb ass  15y ago

Nissan didn't release a time for the spec v because it couldn't beat 7:26.4


User avatar

E  15y ago

That doesn't make sense.

Photo of Nissan GT-R Spec-V R35

Photo of Nissan GT-R Spec-V R35

Photo of Nissan GT-R Spec-V R35

Photo of Nissan GT-R Spec-V R35