|
|
| Track | Time | Position |
Faster than | Slower than |
|
|
Saab 9-5 V6 racing rivals |
| Honda S2000, Nissan 350Z (283bhp), BMW 130i, Subaru Impreza WRX STi, Porsche Cayman S, |
Other cars by Saab (7) | | 9-3 SportCombi 1.9TTiD, 9-3 Sport Combi/Hatch/Wagon, 9-3 Sport Sedan Turbo-X, 9-2X Aero, 9-3 Turbo X SportCombi, 9-5 Aero, 9000 Aero,
|
|
|
|
9-5 V6 technical data |
| Performance |
| Max speed |
- |
| 0-100 km/h |
- |
| 0-160 km/h |
- |
| 0-200 km/h |
- |
| 0-300 km/h |
- |
| Quarter mile |
- |
| 0-100-0 mph |
- |
| Engine |
| Power |
224 kw (300 bhp / 304 ps) |
| Torque |
400 Nm (296 lb-ft) |
| Displacement |
2.8 liters |
| Engine type |
V6 Turbo |
| Engine location |
Front |
| General data |
| Gearbox |
6-speed |
| Drive |
|
| Mass |
1575 kilograms (3465 lbs) |
| Weight distribution |
- |
| Year of introduction |
2010 |
| Home country |
Sweeden |
| Calculations |
| Power to Weight ratio |
190.48 hp/tonne |
| Power per liter |
79.9 kw/liter |
| Fastestlaps.com stats |
| FL Rank |
Position - 1207/1206, 0 points |
| Page views |
689 |
| Car submitted by |
Phavyarden |
|
|
|
Too bad they didnt make that AeroX:(
I WANT IT
I am actually very disappointed...its affected my day. I think that GM was just
plain stupid with their platform sharing. Saab being somewhat of an upscale
brand they used cheap crappy platforms for the Saab. This looks stunning and one
of the best looking sedans I have seen. GM just never gave Saab the attention it
needed.
I guess we should because it will never went into production or will they build
a some of them befor the close the plant?