Performance
| Max speed |
- |
| 0-100 km/h |
- |
| 0-160 km/h |
- |
| 0-200 km/h |
- |
| 0-300 km/h |
- |
| Quarter mile |
- |
| 0-100-0 mph |
- |
Engine
| Power |
235 kw (316 bhp / 320 ps) |
| Torque |
288.79 Nm (214 lb-ft) |
| Displacement |
1.5 liters |
| Engine type |
Powertec Inline-4 Turbo |
| Engine location |
middle |
General data
| Gearbox |
6 |
| Drive |
rear |
| Mass |
500 kilograms (1100 lbs) |
| Weight distribution |
- |
| Year of introduction |
2003 |
| Home country |
UK |
Calculations
| Power to Weight ratio |
631.24 hp/tonne |
| Power per liter |
156.91 kw/liter |
Fastestlaps.com stats
| FL Rank |
Position - 1357/1356, 0 points |
| Page views |
26505 |
| Car submitted by |
unknown |
|
Look at the F1.. in the past they had much more power from smaller turbo engines.. but driving them was a pain in the ass.
Both laps were driven on nearly empty tracks.. the SR8 only passed one car a Mercedes SL AMG on the last corner to the long straight.. costing him less than a second. The SR3 Turbo lap was clear but if I am not wrong they only had time for one hot lap..
The SR3 turbo seems to have an advantage in terms of power/weight...
Is the SR8's chassi, aerodynamics, breaks etc so much better?
6.55->7.19 means 24 seconds; that's quite a big diffference...