cars are proven them selves with or without BM and there is nothing wrong with
BM Japanese cars are in it owns advantages conditions you watch soccer right??
have you ever watched any of the comparisons on Best Motoring?? i remember when
the had an stock GTR pull AWAY from an LP640..going a full mile " thats gotta
tell ya somthing. and a stock NSX-R beating an 360 Ferrari RACE CAR round
tsukuba? come on yall. not that i dont like best motoring, but there biased with
japanese cars.
explain why they didn't be biased for the gt-r when they compare it with the
gallardo supperleggera they managed a better time in the gallado even when it
wasn't faster in the rest of world track
have watched when they compare the 09 gt-r and the lp-560 plus the 430 scuderia
in tsukuba (very wet)
this is the results
gt-r 1.15.257
lp 560 1.15.433 esp off
scuderia 1.18.558
and you can't consider this as a biased because all reviewers around the world
test cars in different conditions and it doesn't matter if they choose rainy
time or not
its just like anonymous said...there biased, there obviosly not gonna be biased
all the time, but if anyone has watched bm as much as i have, will no that bm is
biased towards all but japanese cars!! come on, a nsx pulling away from a m6? a
skyline r34 doing a 12.1 in the quarter mile..STOCK? i dont think so!!
i definetly wouldnt say magazines are as biased as Best Motoring. not that im
biased or anything but best motoring does seem to have the japanese cars be a
lil faster then there competitors.
WRONG weight,according to porsche.de this car curb weight is 1480kg or 1510kg
PDK version,and if you want EG Richtlinie just add 75kg to each of these
figures.