Performance

Max speed 190.34 miles/h (307 km/h)
0-100 km/h 4.1 seconds
0-160 km/h 8.5 seconds
0-200 km/h 13.1 seconds
0-300 km/h -
Quarter mile 11.9 seconds
0-100-0 mph -

Engine

Power 331 kw (444 bhp / 450 ps)
Torque 620 Nm (459 lb-ft)
Displacement 3.6 liters
Engine type Boxer 6, Twin Turbo, 24v
Engine location Rear

General data

Gearbox 6
Drive All wheel drive
Mass 1540 kilograms (3388 lbs)
Weight distribution -
Year of introduction 2004
Home country Germany

Calculations

Power to Weight ratio 288.23 hp/tonne
Power per liter 91.94 kw/liter

Fastestlaps.com stats

FL Rank Position - 1357/1356, 0 points
Page views 6183
Car submitted by unknown

2004 Porsche 996 Turbo S

Photo of Porsche 996 Turbo S
Add laptime for "996 Turbo S"    Add photo

Lap Times (1)

Track Time Position Faster than Slower than
Autozeitung test track 1:38.5 20/570 BMW M3 Sedan (E90) Porsche 997 Carrera 4S (facelift)

Other cars by Porsche (139)

Carrera GT, 997 Turbo, 997 Carrera S, 997 GT3, Cayman S, 996 GT3 RS, 996 GT2, 986 Boxster S (262bhp), 993 Carrera, 997 Carrera 4, 993 GT2, 996 GT3 late, 996 Turbo, 964 Carrera RS N/GT, 964 Carrera RS 3.8, 987 Boxster, 968 Club Sport, 968 TurboS, 928 GTS, 964 TurboS, 993 Turbo (3.6), 996 Carrera 4S, 996 Carrera, ... show more

Community comments (15)

11 months ago
no... the Leistungskit is a engine perfromance option package that was avaible as option for the standart 996 Turbo (order code X50) from 2002... the 2005 Turbo S has exactly the same engine but it came standart with other stuff that the 996 Turbo did not had in stock trim, like PCCB (ceramic brake).
11 months ago
Is the Porsche 996 Turbo Leistungskit same as this car?
Here is a link about the 996 Turbo Leistungskit (Choose the 2003 Porsche 996 Turbo Leistungkit):
http://www.einszweidrei.de/
1 year ago
added
1 year ago
Please add these datas:
0-100: 4,1 s
0-160: 8,5 s
0-200: 13,1 s
Reference: Auto Zeitung 08/2005.
http://www.einszweidrei.de/
Choose the 2005 996 Turbo S
Thanks!
2 years ago
Because, apparently, the track they used in 2003 was shorter than that of all the other tests.
2 years ago
why?
2 years ago
I removed 996 Turbo S Bedford time along with others from this http://www.radicalsportscars.com/media/trackdaycar03/index.php test. Because, apparently, the track they used in 2003 was shorter than that of all the other tests.
2 years ago
EVO from October 2004 has new times and says that the track was recently revised and is now up to 1.8 miles from 1.7
2 years ago
The link says about the Trackday Car of the Year 2003. Are you sure about the track length? In that case we must delete that 1:19.5 or (better) make a new form of Bedford circuit and adding the cars from that event.
2 years ago
It was probably set on the 2004 track. I have an old EVO from then and the track was slightly shorter. That time is between Porsche 911 GT3 1:19.40 and BMW M3 CSL 1:19.95
2 years ago
Anybody knows something more about that time at Bedford?
2 years ago
The reference is good but I also can't belive that 1:19.5. Maybe the conditions were perfect or EVO had a better driver to test the cars. I also suspect that the track was a bit shorter or somehow different from the track where Enzo and GTR were tested; I saw the times in that article http://www.radicalsportscars.com/media/trackdaycar03/index.php and all cars were about 2-3 seconds faster than I would bet! Btw, many cars from that link are not on FastestLaps in Bedford Autodrome West Circuit (pre 06/2008) list.
2 years ago
is this bedford autodome time the real deal? cause i find it a lil hard to believe this 996 911 turbo beat the Porsche Carrera GT Mclaren F1 and a Ferrari Enzo and a Nissan GT-R R35 round that track, it just seems a lil odd.
3 years ago
1/4 Mile: 11.9 sec. http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suv/163_0310_porsche_cayenne_turbo_9
11_x50/specs_price.html#Scene_2

4961 fastest lap times for 2571 cars from 218 manufacturers.
(c) Fastestlaps.com 2006-2010