2004 Nissan Nismo R34 Z-Tune |
   
|
|
|
Nissan Nismo R34 Z-Tune racing rivals |
| Lamborghini Gallardo, Ferrari 360 CS, Porsche 997 Turbo, Lamborghini Murcielago, Lamborghini Diablo, |
Other cars by Nissan (55) | | Skyline GT-R R34, 350Z (283bhp), Skyline 350 GT, Skyline R32 GT-R, Skyline R33 GT-R, 200SX, Almera GTI, Pulsar GTi-R, 300 ZX Turbo, Qashqai 2.0 4WD, 350Z Roadster, Exa (N13), Exa (N12), NX, 350Z (308bhp), GT-R, Skyline GT-R R34 V-Spec, Skyline Coupe 370GT TypeS, 300ZX TwinTurbo Version R 2by2, NISMO 400R, Skyline GT-R R34 M-Spec NUR, Nismo 270R, Nismo 350Z, ... show moreSilvia S15 Spec R Aero, Skyline GT-R R32 V-spec, Skyline GT-R R33 V-Spec II, Micra 160SR, Skyline GT-R R34 V-Spec II, 300ZX, R390 GT1, Maxima SV, Nismo 370Z, Skyline GTS-T R32, Nismo Tiida S-Tune, 370Z, Sileighty, March Superturbo R, 350Z Racing Edition, Skyline 2000 GT-R (C10), Skyline 2000 GT-R (C110), Skyline R33 GT-R V-spec, 180SX, Skyline R34 GT25 Turbo, GT-R Spec-V, 370Z Roadster, Altima Coupe, 370Z Roadster, Nismo GT-R Club Sport, Sunny GTi, Skyline Crossover 270GT Type P, Maxima, Armada, Altima V6, 200 SX (S13), 300ZX Turbo (Z31), ... show less
|
Community comments (56)
|
|
Nismo R34 Z-Tune technical data |
| Performance |
| Max speed |
- |
| 0-100 km/h |
- |
| 0-160 km/h |
- |
| 0-200 km/h |
- |
| 0-300 km/h |
- |
| Quarter mile |
- |
| 0-100-0 mph |
- |
| Engine |
| Power |
368 kw (493 bhp / 500 ps) |
| Torque |
540 Nm (400 lb-ft) |
| Displacement |
2.8 liters |
| Engine type |
6 Cylinder, 24 Valve |
| Engine location |
front |
| General data |
| Gearbox |
6 |
| Drive |
all |
| Mass |
1600 kilograms (3520 lbs) |
| Weight distribution |
- |
| Year of introduction |
2004 |
| Home country |
Japan |
| Calculations |
| Power to Weight ratio |
308.44 hp/tonne |
| Power per liter |
131.43 kw/liter |
| Fastestlaps.com stats |
| FL Rank |
Position - 1207/1206, 0 points |
| Page views |
15221 |
| Car submitted by |
Ytterbium |
|
More Nismo R34 Z-Tune photos |
 |  |  |  |  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So what if the donor cars were 2.hand, they didn't have 20,000 miles on the clocks when they were sold, they had 0 miles and full warranty.
Anyway I would own one over a R35, and it was only $170,000 so that's not too bad for a car with only 19 examples around and is quite fast. For 1999 to 2004 tech it's still a fast car.
I love my R34 GTR but it's not super fast, it's just sexy and fun. They were made for mods but I prefer mine stock.
But every Z-Tune has left orginal the Nissan factory as a normal Nissan Skyline R34 GT-R, were it was used by private owners, then it was bought back by Nismo from private owners and were modified by Nismo to Z-Tune standart and resold
LOL, some unbeatable car.
Oh yeah, and the Z-tune only managed a 1'06'71, but I'm sure those times posted are accurate...
Here's the vid:http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3741h_best-motoring-battle_auto
Ha, get over yourself kid. Quit nutswinging and look at some racing history to see that you're completely off.
? How the Hell do you figure that, Stock for Stock, NO Nissan can beat the R35 Cept the R390.
And the R34 and even R32 are still faster than the R35, and i think that includes the ztune in general as well. It'll definitely never come close to the ztunes drag times. And the ztune is nowhere near the fastest R34.
2nd, it's double its price because it's a collectible; an official statement of what the R34 (R32-R34 really) actually are, whether morans in the stupid fuckin west like it or not. You can turn your car into Nismo and get it the full ztune package/kit for much less without getting one of the 17 actual ztunes ever made (AFAIR they never got a hold of enough R34s that were up to their mint standards to make the 20 they wanted). But gettin one of the factory-made-fresh ztunes of the very rare and few that were made will cost you.
3rd, i have no fuckin idea why you mention Sugo (or anything, really). It's an older time (the ztune had an older time on tsukuba that was annihilated much worse than the Sugo by the GTR one as well), and I've not seen it, but i'm willing to bet that something is missing and its embellished. .5 seconds is big on tsukuba, and the ztune beat it by almost a second.
The "problem" with the R35 is that its untouchable for the most part, so far any tinkering with its drivetrain has not done a whole lot for it or even made it slower outside of drag. And of course theres no reason to focus on dragging a 3800lb AWD supercar, it's meant for circuit racing. But you're right, its a more current, interesting technological feat (or more like a slap in the face) in being a nearly _4000_lb AWD car with a simple V6 that kills cars that weight lighter with fancy pants v10s+, cost tons more including to manufacture, etc.
PS. the fuckin picture of the black car was uploaded elsewhere where it was at the least better suited. It's not a ztune its an R34 GTR V-Spec II stock body, and the only single difference in body between the V-Spec II and a standard GTR is the hood has a NACA duct in it. So put it up on the regular R34 GTR page too since it belongs there more than here.
R34 gtrs were made to be about as fast as the R35 is, then detuned for the public, and can be made faster...
yes its a production car, 100%.
yes, the car did a 10.6 by Japan Car magazine in bad conditions. Nissan claimed 10.06. An R34 doing 10s is nothing new.
yes, the black skyline *I* uploaded to this site ELSEWHERE on a regular R34 GTR page is not a ztune, its an R34 GTR STOCK body.
yes "Georg", if you read this and are still here, kill yourself.
"NissanFanboys" should meet me somewhere in the streets (LA) instead, and i can do the honors.
I get that it's your opinion, but you are drawing an arbitrary line. The fact that it's an extreme street car shouldn't stand against. Can you segregate it from most cars? Yes, if there is some specific set of criteria that excludes cars like the Z-Tune. On a general basis, it's an absolutely normal car.
The same logic you implemented could be used to exclude any car that is the slightest bit more track capable than another car from comparison.
And I'll say again, this is all for the sake of discussion, not an attack on you. Reply of your own will and interest.
They aren't directed at anyone, they're just my opinion.
I just don't think it should be compared to mass produced production cars... I suppose.
It's basically a time attack car built by nismo IMO.
The only thing IMO that separates this car from cars built by XS-engineering and HKS is that Nismo rebuilt it through Nissan and sold it as a new car; and hks will build you a quicker car for less money...
It just seems like a cop-out to me.
But oh well... Still a great car none the less.
“is it in the same spirit of comparing to other stock cars?”
What does that mean? If you're saying this can't be compared to other cars, that doesn't make sense.