|
|
| Track | Time | Position |
Faster than | Slower than |
|
|
Nissan Exa (N13) racing rivals |
| Alfa Romeo 159 2.2 JTS, Audi A6 2.4 Avant, Mercedes E 200 K Combi, Audi A6 2.7 TDI Avant, BMW 525d Touring, |
Other cars by Nissan (59) | | Skyline GT-R R34, 350Z (283bhp), Skyline 350 GT, Skyline R32 GT-R, Skyline R33 GT-R, 200SX, Almera GTI, Pulsar GTi-R, 300 ZX Turbo, Qashqai 2.0 4WD, 350Z Roadster, Exa (N12), NX, 350Z (308bhp), Nismo R34 Z-Tune, GT-R, Skyline GT-R R34 V-Spec, Skyline Coupe 370GT TypeS, 300ZX TwinTurbo Version R 2by2, NISMO 400R, Skyline GT-R R34 M-Spec NUR, Nismo 270R, Nismo 350Z, ... show moreSilvia S15 Spec R Aero, Skyline GT-R R32 V-spec, Skyline GT-R R33 V-Spec II, Micra 160SR, Skyline GT-R R34 V-Spec II, 300ZX, R390 GT1, Maxima SV, Nismo 370Z, Skyline GTS-T R32, Nismo Tiida S-Tune, 370Z, Sileighty, March Superturbo R, 350Z Racing Edition, Skyline 2000 GT-R (C10), Skyline 2000 GT-R (C110), Fuga 450GT, Skyline R33 GT-R V-spec, 180SX, Skyline R34 GT25 Turbo, GT-R Spec-V, 370Z Roadster, Altima Coupe, NISMO 350Z S-Tune, Nismo GT-R Club Sport, Sunny GTi, Skyline Crossover 270GT Type P, Maxima, Armada, Altima V6, 200 SX (S13), 300ZX Turbo (Z31), X-Trail 2.2 dCi, Skyline 370GT Type-S, Skyline R33 GTS, ... show less
|
Community comments (7)
|
|
Exa (N13) technical data |
| Performance |
| Max speed |
139.5 miles/h (225 km/h) |
| 0-100 km/h |
9.75 seconds |
| 0-160 km/h |
- |
| 0-200 km/h |
- |
| 0-300 km/h |
- |
| Quarter mile |
16.8 seconds |
| 0-100-0 mph |
- |
| Engine |
| Power |
93 kw (125 bhp / 126 ps) |
| Torque |
154 Nm (114 lb-ft) |
| Displacement |
1.8 liters |
| Engine type |
4-Cylinder 16-Valve DOHC |
| Engine location |
Front |
| General data |
| Gearbox |
5 |
| Drive |
Front |
| Mass |
1145 kilograms (2519 lbs) |
| Weight distribution |
- |
| Year of introduction |
1987 |
| Home country |
Japane |
| Calculations |
| Power to Weight ratio |
108.92 hp/tonne |
| Power per liter |
51.67 kw/liter |
| Fastestlaps.com stats |
| FL Rank |
Position - 1357/1356, 0 points |
| Page views |
2728 |
| Car submitted by |
Machalel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 1/4 mile time also looks rather quick?
sure I can..weight is a constant force... air drag is a increasing force (increase in square not liniar) after passing 160km/h (100mph) 100kg more or less play no rule in topspeed... my car fully loaded reach the same topspeed as empty... at low power cars they lost topspeed only at uphill sections with higher weight..this car with 100kg more would rech the same topspeed.. weight plays only a rule from a standing start at low speeds..
You can't say "no rule". I would better say "has a very little influence". Because 1000 ton car will never run as fast as 1 ton car if both have about 100 hp. 1000 car would stand still :D