2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X FQ300 SST |
 
|
|
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X FQ300 SST racing rivals |
| Nissan Skyline GT-R R34, Honda S2000, Renault Clio 182, Audi TT 3.2 quattro (8N), Mazda RX-8, |
Other cars by Mitsubishi (54) | | Lancer EVO IX, Lancer Evo VIII, Evo VII, Lancer Evo VI, Colt CZT, Eclipse, Galant VR-4, Outlander 2.0 DI-D, GTO MR, Lancer GSR Evo X, GTO MR (Mk II), Lancer RS Evolution II, GTO MR (Mk III), Lancer 2.0 DI-D, FTO GPX, Evo VIII FQ400, Lancer Evolution IX MR FQ-360, Lancer GTS, Outlander 2.4 4WD, Lancer Ralliart, Evo X RS, Lancer Evo X MR, Evo IX FQ 340, ... show moreEvo VIII FQ 300, Evo VIII MR FQ 320, Lancer Evo VIII MR FQ 340, Lancer Evo IX GSR, Outlander 2.2 DI-D, Lancer Evolution Wagon, EVO X MR SST, Evo X FQ 360, Evo IX MR FQ 320, Colt Ralliart Version-R Special, Lancer Evolution I GSR, LancerEvolution III GSR, Lancer Evo VIII RS, Diamante 3000 V6 MIVEC, Lancer Sportback Ralliart, Eclipse GT, Lancer EX 2000 Turbo, Colt Gti (CAO), EVO X FQ330, Lancer Evo V, Lancer Evolution X FQ-400, Lancer Evolution IV GSR, 3000 GT VR-4, Lancer Evo X (EU-spec), Galant Ralliart, Lancer Evolution X RALLIART, Magna VR-X, Outlander GT, 3000 GT, Eclipse GT, Galant VR-4 V6, ... show less
|
|
|
|
Lancer Evo X FQ300 SST technical data |
| Performance |
| Max speed |
155 miles/h (250 km/h) |
| 0-100 km/h |
- |
| 0-160 km/h |
13.9 seconds |
| 0-200 km/h |
- |
| 0-300 km/h |
- |
| Quarter mile |
13.9 100mph seconds |
| 0-100-0 mph |
- |
| Engine |
| Power |
214 kw (287 bhp / 291 ps) |
| Torque |
407 Nm (301 lb-ft) |
| Displacement |
2.0l liters |
| Engine type |
inline4 16V DOHC turbo |
| Engine location |
front |
| General data |
| Gearbox |
Six-speed twin-clutch sequential manual gearbox, four-wheel drive, S-A |
| Drive |
AWD |
| Mass |
1590 kilograms (3498 lbs) |
| Weight distribution |
57/43 |
| Year of introduction |
2008 |
| Home country |
Japan |
| Calculations |
| Power to Weight ratio |
180.52 hp/tonne |
| Power per liter |
107.02 kw/liter |
| Fastestlaps.com stats |
| FL Rank |
Position - 1207/1206, 0 points |
| Page views |
10961 |
| Car submitted by |
Georg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evo X FQ300 SST. It would be so much easier if there was just one EVO X instead
of thousand different versions that do not have that much difference
performance-wise. What they have are increasingly stupid and complicated names
to mask the fact that EVO X is actually slower than EVO VI. Evolution is
considered to be process of improvement. Therefore Mitsubishi should really call
EVO X "Lancer Degradation X".
It is Mitsubishi model politic...
the perfromance different between the models could be huge by completely
different cerb weight and power.. the SST is the dual clutch version which Evo
Magazine has tested..
Not every Evo offers the same track perfromance clearly visible now that we have
corrected the laptimes by claiming the correct model which has done the
laptime.. just look at the TopGear track.. many used the Evo laptimes there to
show the perfromance of a basic Evo.. ignoring that they were driven by hardcore
FQ 320-400 models which are way more expansive as the basic model.
The Top Gear lap time was a manual version I think rather than the SST.
This Evo lapped the Top Gear track in 1:28.22 not 1:28.2