Performance

Max speed 155 miles/h (250 km/h)
0-100 km/h 4.3 seconds
0-160 km/h 9.4 seconds
0-200 km/h 13.7 seconds
0-300 km/h -
Quarter mile 13.0 seconds
0-100-0 mph -

Engine

Power 350 kw (469 bhp / 476 ps)
Torque 700 Nm (518 lb-ft)
Displacement 5.4 liters
Engine type V8, Supercharged, 32v
Engine location Front

General data

Gearbox 5
Drive Rear
Mass 1855 kilograms (4081 lbs)
Weight distribution -
Year of introduction 2002
Home country Germany

Calculations

Power to Weight ratio 253.09 hp/tonne
Power per liter 64.83 kw/liter

Fastestlaps.com stats

FL Rank Position - 1357/1356, 0 points
Page views 9341
Car submitted by unknown

2002 Mercedes SL 55 AMG

Photo of Mercedes SL 55 AMG

Other cars by Mercedes (196)

SLK 55 AMG, CLK DTM, SL65 AMG, CLS 55 AMG, C 55 AMG, SLK 55 AMG Black Series, CLK 63 AMG, SLK 350 (R171), SL 500, C 30 CDI AMG, 190E 2.5-16V Evo II, A 190, SL 500, C 32 AMG, SLK 32 AMG, CLK 55 AMG, C 43 AMG, CL 65 AMG, E 55 AMG, C 230K Sports Coupe, CL 500, E 55 AMG (W210), E 500, ... show more

Community comments (31)

5 months ago
12.5 Quarter Mile (at least)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-hHpRUvMWQ
5 months ago
@ Flimper, if you're refering to the straightline performance, one reason is that that the new one has less torque.
5 months ago
I have driven both of these cars, the sl55 sounds much better and the front end is noticably lighter. The 55 handles better than the 600. It is a better car overall
5 months ago
1:15.9 --- 123.320 km/h - Mercedes SL 55 AMG (sport auto 04/02)
1:16.5 --- 122.353 km/h - Mercedes SL 55 AMG, 517 hp/2004 kg (sport auto 12/04)

Seems the newer car is slower, maybe because it's heavier?
5 months ago
This car should have 500ps I think. The hockenheim time should be 1.15.9 as well.

sport auto: Mercedes SL 55 AMG vs. SL 600

http://www.rs6.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=497&d=1048106913
6 months ago
Apparently the car was released as having 469hp but Mercedes found the engines actually produced 493hp so upped the figure.
7 months ago
I have one of these and there is a supplement book with the manual that says it is 500 bhp
7 months ago
try evotech they can hook you up with 650hp maybe less for your "02 MB sl55"

http://www.evotech.de/konfigurator/konf_00.php3?extern=0?112,176
7 months ago
At very high speed weight becomes less of a problem, the real problem is cd. The sl is quite good here. The sl's real advantage is the torque. It has much more than most other cars, and at very high speed this shows through. Does anyone know who can mod this car without causing damage? I see alot of people in tha states are doing this
7 months ago
He didnt exactly specify which GT3. but if were going to go that route, just put a 525bhp SL63 vs a 435bhp GT3 II, and its still going to be an interesting match to see a 380bhp GT3 vs a 493bhp Sl55, you also have to remember its all in the drivers, not just the cars.
7 months ago
Anonymous, I think you have lost this argument. 997 vs SL55 is not a fair comparison to begin with. 997 GT3 was introduced 4 years (!) after SL55.

This guy says he has owned SL55 for 5 years which means those GT3 must have been against 996.
7 months ago
what are we talking about here?? tuned vs stock??

stock to stock gt3 will win

modded ecu SL 55 AMG vs 996 gt3 200km/h to 300km/h the Mb will win
7 months ago
Im not talking about a 996 GT3, im talking about the 435bhp 997 911 GT3, that will even beat the SL63, but, a SL55 vs 996 GT3 would be an interesting match nontheless.
7 months ago
Take a look at this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaxspEEMuOY

That's E55 vs 997 GT3 RS. It's not hard to imagine SL55 vs 996 GT3.

GT3 are not dragsters.
7 months ago
F360 Yes, but not a GT3, GT3 is 1000+lbs Lighter, and has a slightly better Cd, same with the F430, it wont beat them, power isnt everything, and its not nit-picking, its truth!
7 months ago
It will beat GT3, Vanquish and F360 no doubt. And 493 hp ~ 500 hp car. Stop nit-picking.
7 months ago
This has 493bhp, it will not beat a GT3 to 186mph, nor a 430, Vanquish, Maybe. even after is a guess.
7 months ago
This is a 500 car stock. Of course it will beat GT3, Vanquish and V8 Ferraris in a high speed street race.
7 months ago
I removed the limiter in the first year,apart from that it has clean filters,no mods atall.The supercharger pushes 11.5 lds (this equates to 10 litres normally aspirated) The car may be heavy but it is slippery.Alot of cars are quick up to 120 or 130mph but they simply dont have the shear grunt around 150 or more. Believe me the sl does,and in trouncing bucket loads. I suspect 95% of supercar owners don't have the guts to play at very high speeds.The sl has a very high top speed and it is still accelerating very hard at 150mph. There is plenty of evidence to support this all over the net.
7 months ago
LOL to actually think you beat a GT3,Vanquish ans some Ferrari with this LOL and if you did no, this dont go no 200mph, so if your going to say that claim, say its not stock, then people could actually believe you.
7 months ago
I have owned an sl55 for five years. The staggering performance only becomes apparent over 120mph.
From here on up to 200mph its torque and not peak horsepwer that matters. The sl wins out here because of the torque curve created by the supercharger. I have thrashed every supercar whose driver has had the guts to take it up in the 120-150's and over. Porsche GT3's, Vanquish s' ferraris, they simply wilt. They fade in the rear view mirror.
1 year ago
0-200 km acceleration , has it been changed it was almost 16 seconds plus , is it changed or whats goin on ???!!!
1 year ago
more likely 60s +/-
1 year ago
I have a stock E55 and its limited i want to know the time if i open it , is it 50 second?? or less???
Pages:    12Next
4961 fastest lap times for 2571 cars from 218 manufacturers.
(c) Fastestlaps.com 2006-2010