Mercedes E63 AMG racing rivals
Lamborghini Gallardo , Porsche 997 Turbo , Ferrari F355 , Lamborghini Diablo , BMW M6 ,
Other cars by Mercedes (176) SL 55 AMG , SLK 55 AMG , CLK DTM , SL65 AMG , CLS 55 AMG , C 55 AMG , SLK 55 AMG Black Series , CLK 63 AMG , SLK 350 (R171) , SL 500 , C 30 CDI AMG , 190E 2.5-16V Evo II , A 190 , SL 55 AMG , SL 500 , C 32 AMG , SLK 32 AMG , CLK 55 AMG , C 43 AMG , CL 65 AMG , E 55 AMG , C 230K Sports Coupe , CL 500 , ... show more E 55 AMG (W210) , E 500 , CL 55 AMG , E 63 AMG , S 450 , S 500 4Matic , CLK 350 , S 600 , E 200 K Combi , E 350 , E 200 K , B 200 CDI , C 200 CDI Combi , A 200 CDI , C 230 , CLK 55 AMG , E 320 CDI , C 220 CDI , CL 63 AMG , G 55 AMG , CLK 320 CDI Cabriolet , CLK 430 , E 200 K , C 200 K , CLK 320 CDI , S 500 , CLK-GTR AMG , CL 65 AMG , C 180K , A 200 , CLK 63 Black Series , E 280 , CLS 63 AMG , C 220 CDI Estate , C 63 AMG , C 200 CDI , S 320 CDI 4 Matic , 300 SL , S 350 , C 220 CDI T , ML 500 , C 350 , E 500 , SLK 350 (Facelift) , CLK DTM AMG Cabriolet , S55 AMG (W220) , SL 63 AMG , E 63 AMG T-Model , ML 63 AMG , SLK 280 , CLK 63 AMG Cabriolet , C 320 CDI 4M T , SL 500 , CLC 180K , CLK GTR AMG , CLS 350 CGI , C 63 AMG T-Model , ML 350 , CL 600 , ML 420 CDI , GL 320 CDI , SL 350 , E 350 CGI , C 36 AMG , SL65 AMG Black Series , GLK 350 , 190E 2.3 16 (W201) , A170 BlueEfficiency , E 220 CDI , CLC 350 , S65 AMG , C 320 CDI , GLK 320 CDI 4 Matic , S 320 CDI , C 250 BlueEFFICIENCY , 500E , E 60 AMG , 300 SEL 6.3 (W108) , 450 SEL 6.9 (W116) , 280E (W123) , E50 AMG , 300SL Roadster , S63 AMG (W220) , SL 73 AMG (R129) , E 500 , C55 AMG (W202) , 450SEL , 190E 3.2 AMG , E36 AMG Coupé (C124) , E 350 CDI Coupe , S400 BlueHybrid , SL65 AMG (Facelift) , 300E (W124) AMG 6.0 (Hammer) , 300E (W124) AMG 5.6 (Hammer) , CLS 350 , CL 500 , CLS 500 , S63 AMG (W221) , 190E Evolution I , C320 , CL 600 (C140) , SL 70 AMG (R129) , 190 SL (R121) , CLK 500 , E 420 CDI , SL 350 (facelift) , S500 , E 500 Coupe , S65 AMG (W220) , C 230 Kompressor (W202) , B 200 Turbo , CL 600 , E60 AMG (W210) , SLS AMG , CL 55 AMG , CL 550 4MATIC , E 350 CGI , E 63 AMG Estate , CLK 55 AMG Cabrio , SL 600 , C 63 AMG Performance Package Plus , SLK 200 Kompressor (R171) , SLK 200 (R170) , SLK 200 Kompressor (R171 facelift) , 600 SEL (W140) , 300E (W124) , CLS 550 , 560 SEL (W126) , E 500 Cabriolet , S 600 (W220) , E 220 CDI T , ML 350 Bluetec , E 500 T , E 420 (W124) , SLK 230 Kompressor , 260E , 190E 2.6 , 500 SEL (W126) , 420 SEL (W126) , 250 D (W124) , 300 D Turbo (W124) , E 350 CDI BlueEfficiency , 230E (W123) , 560 SL , 300 CE-24 , 350 SDL (W126) , SL60 AMG , 400 SE (w140) , E 250 CDI T , R 350 BlueTEC 4Motion , S 63 AMG 5.5 Perf. Package , E 250 CGI B.E. Coupe , S 63 AMG 5.5 , ... show less
Community comments (30)
Anonymous
1 year ago
They forgot to put its weight under technical data, i think its the typical
5000lbs. I would never buy a tank...... i mean mercedes.
Innner
1 year ago
They "typical 5000lbs" thats quite the statement
the s65 isnt even 5000lbs this car will be around 3800-4500lbs depending on the
options selected.
you can not like a car or a car make for what ever reason you want. It doesnt
matter what the reason but if your reason is supported but outlandish
statements, then your just being daft.
venom
1 year ago
theyre not 5000 lbs, but they are by no means light!! the suprising thing is
that a 5200 lb bentley can actually outmanuever a 2800 lb mclaren f1 through a
set of cones (proven by r&t)! also beat it in the skidpad and the rolls royce
phantom beat it in 60-0 :/
Inner
1 year ago
Yes very true, but its about the car and how it makes you feel, not how fast you
can go threw a set of cones. i love road and track and find there spec sheet.
however, it is not the be all end all. if a car weights a lot does not mean it
can't handle well the GT-R does weigh a good amount yet goes like stake threw
the cones better than most light weights. so its how the car is made and
developed that maters most not the weight even though light weight helps
Anonymous
1 year ago
i was gonna add this but, this model looks soo stupid, well not really soo
stupid, but those headlights look terrible. o and the top speed de-limited, as
an option is 186mph!!
427
1 year ago
Inner and co., stop bringing up the GT-R on pages that don't even relate to it.
M_is_legend
1 year ago
Impressive if you like to be driven around at high speed...typical extravagent,
big engined brute for ppl who can't drive.Should be a hit 4 benz then lol
anonymous
1 year ago
what do u know???
Babken
11 months ago
Surely is not worth even the rubber on the M5 tire.....
Anonymous
11 months ago
i think ill take the M5.
BaX
7 months ago
RS6 owns this car including M5.
Anonymous
7 months ago
Coming from an Audi Rs fanboy.
Georg
5 months ago
dramatical improved Hockenheim shorttrack laptime..
audi r8
5 months ago
14.6 s to 200km/h ... emm soo slow !!
phavyarden
5 months ago
this time would be corrected in the next months, i'm sure that this car can hit
the 200 km/h in less than 13 secs
phavyarden
4 months ago
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/09q4/2009_cadill
ac_cts-v_vs._2010_jaguar_xfr_2010_mercedes-benz_e63_amg_-comparison_tests
quarter of mile : 12.5
pw
3 months ago
Weight datum of this car is wrong. This E63 AMG weights 1840kg according to the
official MB website:
http://www.mercedes-benz.de/content/germany/mpc/mpc_germany_webs
ite/de/home_mpc/passengercars/home/new_cars/models/e-class/w212/technical_data.h
tml
pw
3 months ago
According to Edmunds it weights 4341 pounds, so it shoul be corrected. Check
3.14: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GINMe7K_aL0&feature=sub
pw
3 months ago
@Pavyarden, E63AMG's time to 200km/h is surely above 13 sec, since it's quarter
mile time is 12,7 sec and it gained 112,4 mph. It's unlikely that it will gain
another 11,6 mph in less than 0,3 sec. Check 2.20:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GINMe7K_aL0&feature=sub
PhantomPorsche
3 months ago
Who would take this over a CTS-V? I would, nothing to do with the emblem just
that the shiny trim in the Cadillac is just too much.
Mr.Turbo
3 months ago
Many would becuse of many resons 1st > as long as it contain the name MB its
better 2> German made 3> Better
Quality .. those are enough
Anonymous
3 months ago
@Mr. Turbo............HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahahahahah LOL
FastestLaps
3 months ago
Beat the CTS-V in direct comparison (same conditions/same driver). Was faster on
track and had almost identical acceleration figures.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_1003_2010_cadilla
c_ctsv_2010_mercedes_benz_e63_amg_comparison/results.html
Anonymous
3 months ago
If cost is a big factor (at this price range, it shouldn't be), take the CTS-V.
Otherwise, take the M-B E63.
Another magazine article...
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/09q4/2009_cadill
ac_cts-v_vs._2010_jaguar_xfr_2010_mercedes-benz_e63_amg_-comparison_tests/2010_m
ercedes-benz_e63_amg_page_4
Pages: 1 2 Next
Add your comment
E63 AMG technical data
Performance
Max speed
155 miles/h (250 km/h)
0-100 km/h
4.5 seconds
0-160 km/h
9.5 seconds
0-200 km/h
14.4 seconds
0-300 km/h
-
Quarter mile
12.5 @ 114.5mph seconds
0-100-0 mph
-
Engine
Power
386 kw (518 bhp / 525 ps)
Torque
630 Nm (466 lb-ft)
Displacement
6.2 liters
Engine type
V8
Engine location
Front
General data
Gearbox
7 speed automatic
Drive
rear
Mass
1765 kilograms (3883 lbs)
Weight distribution
54/46
Year of introduction
2009
Home country
Germany
Calculations
Power to Weight ratio
293.28 hp/tonne
Power per liter
62.26 kw/liter
Fastestlaps.com stats
FL Rank
Position - 1207/1206, 0 points
Page views
4820
Car submitted by
427