2009 Lamborghini Murciélago LP 670-4 SuperVeloce

That's a 0-60 mph time not 0-100 km/h. The 3.0 seconds is the right.

check out this....0-100kmh=2.8sec and dont look at first info on the page some idiot wrote it..... http://www.carforums.net/showthread.php?t=91369

Pretty quick considering the power/weight.

r u stupid? reeeeeeead,its a wet lap.

Slower than a Yaris T-Sport?! Come on that's impossible!

Beautiful sound!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOV8n8KGS4o

its only because of the 10s diff in the wet test, we all know which is faster.

Check this... http://www.fastestlaps.com/comparisons/459a7fb603aa5-vs-_Lamborg hini_Lamborghini_Murcilago_LP_670-4_SuperVeloce.html
That's funny!

oh no!!!!!why this car lap time in nurburgring is even slower than the lp640? this is not true!!!!!

"None of us here is able to do a under 8:00min lap with a Apollo at the first flying lap..."

That is NOT true at all, the only difference between Pro race drivers, and non pro race drivers, is that they have sopnsors and have acces to the best equipment and resources, where non race drivers, have non o those, so dont assume that just because there race drivers they will beat every non race driver.

Geaor, did you make a mistake in those numners you listed?

if they used the same set up they had on all the other tracks like nardo, balocco, sachsenring etc,
this car could have done a heaps better laptime at the ring. yes?

@supercharger what is disapointing if a car journalist gets close to factory claimed laptimes driven by race drivers with many laps to get the best..for example Horst von Saumra could only do one hot lap with the Apollo without knowing the car getting a 7:24 is a sensation...and thats pretty amazing close to the 7:11 done by a race driver with the Apollo after three days testing at the Ring. None of us here is able to do a under 8:00min lap with a Apollo at the first flying lap...
Sometimes Horst von Saumra even beat factory testdrivers around the Ring..happen at the Koenigsegg CCR were they reached a 2second faster time than the Koenigsegg test driver.

GTR 7:26.7 > 7:36
Apollo 7:11 > 7:24
ZR1 7:24 > 7:38
Z06 7:42 > 7:49
R8 (4.2) 7:54 > 8:04
CCR 7:36 < 7:34
Carrera GT 7:28 > 7:32

the northloop is the only track were many factory laptimes meet many independent laptimes driven by mostly one magazine with one driver behind the wheel... taking into account that sportauto can´t risk to destroy a very expansive exotic car during a time attack run their resluts are pretty impressive

SA is not the only choice for lap information, they just happen to be the closes to the ring thats all.

aw now come on sport auto have been disapointing evryone wth their test resaults (exept for th gumpert apollos 7.11 ring time) a car like th lp670 should be able to go much quicker thn 7.42 hell it should be getting some were in th late 7.20s wth its specifications lol tht lap time is a joke over 200hp more thn a gt3 and th smae lap time.what a joke.

this is one of the best sounding cars ever

the ring laptime is correct...
sportauto claims that Lamborghini setup the car for safty reasons with a tendenz to understeer... to protect the driver from snap oversteer which could easy happen with the given power... but that ruins the northloop laptime. sportauto claims with a more neutral setup the car would be lot faster around the Ring. Next to that they realized that the brake balance is not 100% correct setup, there is to much brakeforce at the rear axle, on a wet track it is easy to loose control if you brake to hard into a corner because the rear axle over brake

On road & tracks they said that it did 0-60mp/h in 2.8sec

sumthing must be wrong

WTF. check out the nurburgring laptime.

Not when you can get a Gumpert for the Same price!

Yes; IMO is is worth every nickel

Shadowman

This car is great n all, but is it worth $110,000 over an LP640?

It could definetly take it on no question, but i dont think it would beat it, meybe a 7:25?