2009 Jaguar XKR (510 bhp) |
   
|
|
|
Jaguar XKR (510 bhp) racing rivals |
| BMW M5 (E60), BMW M3 CSL (E46), Ferrari F355, Mercedes SL 55 AMG, Lotus Esprit V8, |
Other cars by Jaguar (32) | | XKR, XKR, S-Type R, S-Type 3.0, XK Convertible, XJR, XK8, XJR-15, XJ220, XJR, XKR convertible, E-type Series 1 3.8l, E-type Series 1½ 4.2l, XJ-6 3.0, XJ220S TWR, XF SV8, XF 2.7D, S-Type Diesel, XK60 Special Edition, XKR-S, XJ-6 2.7D, XF-R, XK (385 bhp), ... show moreXK8 Mk1, XJR, XK, XJ12 6.0, XJR-S 6.0, XF 3.0 V6 Diesel ( 270 BHP ), XF 3.0 V6 Diesel, XKR convertible (510 PS), XJ-R 4.0, ... show less
|
Community comments (52)
|
|
XKR (510 bhp) technical data |
| Performance |
| Max speed |
155 miles/h (250 km/h) |
| 0-100 km/h |
4.6 seconds |
| 0-160 km/h |
9.0 seconds |
| 0-200 km/h |
13.3 seconds |
| 0-300 km/h |
- |
| Quarter mile |
12.8 seconds |
| 0-100-0 mph |
- |
| Engine |
| Power |
375 kw (503 bhp / 510 ps) |
| Torque |
625 Nm (463 lb-ft) |
| Displacement |
5.0 liters |
| Engine type |
V8 |
| Engine location |
front |
| General data |
| Gearbox |
6 speed automatic |
| Drive |
RWD |
| Mass |
1865 kilograms (4103 lbs) |
| Weight distribution |
54/46 |
| Year of introduction |
2009 |
| Home country |
UK |
| Calculations |
| Power to Weight ratio |
269.64 hp/tonne |
| Power per liter |
75 kw/liter |
| Fastestlaps.com stats |
| FL Rank |
Position - 1207/1206, 0 points |
| Page views |
4555 |
| Car submitted by |
427 |
|
More XKR (510 bhp) photos |
 |  |  |  |  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jaguar continues it's commitment to keeping their cars off race tracks by making them fundamentally incapable of being competitive and use their ECUs to block corrective modifications.
Do you know what language that is?
It also out-performs the M6 in every possible way.
obviously.....lol
http://www.fastestlaps.com/comparisons/45896d4b380a0-vs-_Jaguar_ XKR_510_bhp.html
end of story
U must be dreaming !
Drive it.Then talk.
Good idea, then you wouldn't be spouting incorrect representations of the Mustang.
Track times don't have alot to do with real world conditons. Did you notice that I said from 70 to 160? Besides the XKR's numbers are right in the range of the R8 V10. There is very little data on both cars so throwing numbers back and forth doesn't mean much this early in the game. I have no reason to make up stories. It lost, live with it.
XKR VIR 3:06.4
R8 V10 2:59.5
R8 V10 tested 1/4mile time 11.5 > 12.3
R8 V10 0-100mph 7.8s > 8.8s
you failed
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/09q4/2010_jaguar_xkr-sho rt_take_road_test
http://www.jaguar.com/de/de/#/xk/specifications
and yes the XKR is 140kg more heavy than the XK 1660kg (~3670lbs.)