2009 Jaguar XF-R

Why the balocco time of this car don't appears in the track page?

Thats better, but i still think it can be much faster, i mean the 420bhp XKR did a 12.6 at 112mph.

1/4 Mile must corrected here !!

quarter of mile 12.6



http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/download/0809_CTS-VvsXFR_comp chart.pdf

This car looks like it would be a really mean daily.

Umong the cars in the class, this is the best looing. I love all of them (M5, E63, RS6, CTS-V, XF-R) so there isn't really a bad choice.

They all have different "personalities" even though they all have 500+ hp

I can't wait for the next gen M5 if it will have more hp/torque than the X5M/X6M.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/hot_lists/high_performance/f urious_four_doors/2010_jaguar_xfr_short_take_road_test

hi

Zero to 60 mph: 4.3 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.6 sec
Zero to 120 mph: 13.6 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 4.6 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.7 sec @ 115 mph
Top speed (governor limited, mfr's claim): 155 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 155 ft





2010 Jaguar XFR - Short Take Road Test/Furious Four-Doors/High Performance/Hot Lists/Reviews/Car and Driver - Car And Driver

Derestricted this hits 195 mph

dude, jags are qite reconized in north america.

These new jags are VERY impressive, its a shame they are not as recognised in northamerica as they are in europe.

Looks really mean! I dont know if this can beat the CTS-V but looks a alot better by a large margin. Best looking car in its class in my opinion.

Jag tested a mildly modified XFR at the Bonneville Salt Flats and managed a top speed of 225mph..... this could be a match for an M5

This car weights 1,891 kg.

http://www.jaguar.co.uk/uk/en/xf/models/specifications/weight_di mensions.htm

These manufacturers estimates are conservative.

13.1 my ass for the 1/4 mile. the 420bhp XF does a 13.2@109, a .1 second difference...i dont thnk so! that driver must have sucked!