2009 Ferrari California GT

Nordschleife-7:56 --- 155.80 km/h - Ferrari California, 460 PS/1787 kg (sport auto 06/10)

Performance
0-60 mph 3,5
0-100 mph 8,6
Quarter Mile 11,9@117,4 mph

Link
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/convertibles/112_0910_2010_ferrari_california_first_test/specs.html

The 1/4 Mile is 12.2 At 118mph, same as a C6 Z51, so that 0-200kmh is prolly more around 13.5, but nonetheless, 14.7 to 20kmh is not dissapointing at all, its not the lightest car, bet it still does not dissapoint, plus it looks good, not really the interior, but then again, who cares.

0-200 time is a bit disappointing.

someone has added this car 3rd on the ring!

“i love those exhausts, atleast there not fake”

About the exaust not being fake.....(from Car and Driver)

The stacked rear tailpipes, like those of the Lexus IS F, are purely cosmetic and have no physical attachment to the ordinary exhaust pipes they conceal.


http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/09q3/2009_ferrari_california_vs._2009_mercedes-benz_sl63_amg-comparison_tests/2009_ferrari_california_page_3

Whaaaat? the Rear is the best part of the car, and i love those exhausts, atleast there not fake..Cough (Lexus) cough.

Taking a look at this car there are several dissapointments i have like those super ugly rear lights, the lexus style exaust, the aston martin front fender and those hood scoops are a thing of the past, i would take the F430 over this any day.

I highly doubt the New F430-Replacement will Kill the GT-R. dont get me wrong, it will definetly be fast, But the performance of the GT-R is nothing to Sneeze at, Specially considering how much it weighs,costs, and powerd, its no joke.

1.4 seconds and 1.9 seconds behind the GT-R but with 20hp less power and a rear drive and exactly same weight...The New F450 and our 7 speed gear box and double clutch,i guess kill the GT-R

Well, since now, California has a pretty good performance for its power to weight ratio.

I love the car, just ordered one, should arrive in Nov this year. can't wait to drive it.

porsche 911 is beather beacuase the bad ferari ever.ferari vs merc the shame porsche is beather

funny how this is out in 2010

I think the torque is 475 Nm not 485. I read 475 Nm in 3 different car magazines.

Weight distribution
47/53

performance source???

in my hometown is the jury meeting for the Europen Chassie of the Year Award, many of the finalist cars are on display open for public including some cut away, yesterday I saw the Ferrari California, new Skoda Superb, new Opel Insignia, new Passat CC, VW Polo Convertible Concept by Karman, Renault Laguna Coupe GT, new Ford Fiesta, new Audi Q5, there were more cars but they were hidden under coverplan.
Talked to a event manager who told me that the new Toyota Avensis and other cars will also displayed outside free for public...

^ Where? and at what event? Just wondering.

saw my first California in public today.. added some real world pictures to the album.

top speed is 192 mph.

I highly doubt this baby will dissapoint in the performance catagory..lol

This car is BEAUTIFUL!! Everything about is gorgeous. The only thing is that I don't think it will be as fast a hoped for, I mean, nearly 2 tons, and only 454 horsepower? May be disappointing in the performance category.

i think the best part of this car is its beautiful shape and most of all its whole rear end, its beautiful all other ferraris rear ends suck in my opinion but this one is plain awesome..lol the thing i dont like about it is the rims..nooo thank you i suspect 7:54 at the nurburgring..;)