0-200 Km/h is 33.5 s
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/vergleichstest/bmw-330d-gegen-mercedes-c-250-cdi-diesel-duell-in-der-mittelklasse-935470.html
Mercedes-Benz C 250 BlueEFFICIENCY specs
Car type | 4-door saloon |
Curb weight | 1570 kg (3461 lbs) |
Introduced | 2008 |
Origin country | Germany |
Views | 14.4k |
Submitted by | Georg |
Lap times
Track | Time |
---|---|
Autozeitung test track | 1:50.10 |
Contidrom (3.3 km) | 1:48.60 |
Performance
0 - 100 kph | 7.1 s |
Est. 0 - 60 mph | 6.7 s |
0 - 100 mph | 17.4 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 10.5 s @ 80.2 mph |
Est. 1/4 mile | 15.8 s @ 96.3 mph |
Top speed | 250 kph (155 mph) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | inline 4 16V DOHC turbo diesel |
Displacement | 2.2 l (134 ci) |
Power | 204 ps (201 bhp / 150 kw) |
Torque | 500 Nm (369 lb-ft) |
Power / liter | 93 ps (91 hp) |
Power / weight | 130 ps (128 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 318 Nm (235 lb-ft) / t |
Transmission | 6 speed manual |
Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
C 250 BlueEFFICIENCY competition
FastestLaps 17y ago
Damn, these modern day diesel engines make petrol engines look stupid and completely pointless!
blacksmoke 4m ago
and yet the c250 petrol as sold in america is quicker than it's diesel sibling
blacksmoke 4m ago
and yes i was surprised, 500nm is a lot of torque so i expected the cdi to be quicker, but diesel engines don't rev as fast as petrol due to diesel burning slower
FastestLaps 4m ago @blacksmoke
Because it was already a turbocharged petrol, like all modern petrols are today. If it was some old-school lazy V6, you would have to rev it high for it to be as fast and it would not "feel" faster and definitely not be as elastic.