2009 Nissan 370Z

0 to 100kmh in 5.1
top speed a tested 253 kmh

http://www.auto.it/prove/nissan/370z/2009/12-3800/scheda/Nissan+370Z%2C+piacere+di+guida

What kind of speed are you talking about? if its a straightline, than its the 370Z, but the Evo will have better traction of then line, and actually a faster 0-60mph, but after that, the Z will be ahead. and as for a track, on a short track, id give it to the Evo, but on a longer track, that goes to the 370Z.

Why don't you just use the compare feature at the top of the page?

give me a hand whats faster? 2009 370Z or 2009 Lancer Evolution GSR?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkdbijHe_H8

370z vs ttrs

i think the z34 with that sport package weighs 3355 lbs, 133 lbs more than the base one??? if i were to buy one i would definitely buy the base without that package

typical Nissan that a Nissan car broke down during a TV magazine track test... see Hungaroring video

Auto Zeitung 16/09

0-100: 5,7
0-160: 13,1
0-200: 20,8

Handling Track: 1:41,0

I am sure it can do better but thats what they have tested in southafrica(the only number I have seen so far for 0-200)...the problem there is they do their test in Johannisburg at very high altitude (1400m abouve sea level) which reduce the perfromance of n/a engines dramaticly, the reason why the twin turbo Z4 35i was much quicker in the acceleration tests and the much over 60hp weaker but turbo powered TT-S reached the same acceleration times.

the time 0-200 km/h = 24.7 ?? .. is it slower than Z350 which can go 0-200 km/h = 22.7 ? !!!

really? it doesn't have a twin clutch like the gtr so i don't think it is as quick as the manual... perhaps...

I think the auto is as quick as the manual.

has any1 tried the AT version of the 370z and has a record of its 0-100 km/h time?

hmm okay rite... actually and the Z got better looks so i'm gonna go with that one then... thx btw... really helps...

yeah they are both made by the best engineers in the world but still the GT-R costs like twice as much... anyway can someone plz give suggestions which is the best for city and drifting? i don't think i can use the GT-R as often as I use the Z coz GT-R isn't actually meant to be used daily but owning a GT-R makes you feel kind of... cool

you wanna drift, get the 370, you wanna be unbeatable round a track get the R35, you wanna be just a regular car thats comfortable, get a Maxima SV.

The best engineers in world make both cars so you cant go wrong.

despite the pricing and performance, which is best? the GT-R or the Z? I'm planning to buy one of these and I'm having a hard time considering which is best for city and drifting. Is it the AWD or the RWD? Again ignore the price and specs coz topspeed and fast acceleration is meaningless in the streets...

Independent testing of the first aftermarket parts is just getting underway really, and the 370Z is responding very well. We've seen RWHP up to ~326-ish on DynoJet with simple bolt-ons and no forced induction. This car is turning out to be an incredibly price to performance ratio lightly modded for track use.

im surprised it $5,000 less than the 350Z!

who said the S2000 will beat it in a strait line!!!!!!!!!!!!

370Z weighs 1488kg, not 1525kg listed here.

if they were to twin-turbocharge the VQ37VHR it it would set the price well over $45k. and thats not the market nissan is going for. this aint the 90 you cant just say "hmm lets release a poor emissions twin-turbo sports car lalalalala". nissan still has to follow japans strict emission laws

You see this is exactly why they should have twin turboed this car in the first place,to eliminate mediocre SPORTY (not sports cars) to the 370z as i told NISSAN that the underpowered 370 will not make a splash without shocking the public with a car that makes a statement as its just another 350z, i mean 370z. If they turboed this car it would have been close to been compared to the GTR, but this car will just fade away!!!! This was NISSANs original sportscar and its just a sportycar, whatever.