Performance

Max speed 150.04 miles/h (242 km/h)
0-100 km/h 6.0 seconds
0-160 km/h 15.1 seconds
0-200 km/h -
0-300 km/h -
Quarter mile 14.1 at 97.2 seconds
0-100-0 mph -

Engine

Power 220 kw (295 bhp / 299 ps)
Torque 366 Nm (271 lb-ft)
Displacement 2.0 liters
Engine type
Engine location front

General data

Gearbox 6 (dual-clutch automated manual transmission )
Drive all wheel drive
Mass 1675 kilograms (3685 lbs)
Weight distribution 59/41
Year of introduction 2008
Home country Japan

Calculations

Power to Weight ratio 176.12 hp/tonne
Power per liter 109.99 kw/liter

Fastestlaps.com stats

FL Rank Position - 1357/1356, 0 points
Page views 11535
Car submitted by Javi ( spain)

2008 Mitsubishi EVO X MR SST

Photo of Mitsubishi EVO X MR SST

Community comments (15)

2 weeks ago
I'm not much of a Mustang fan but I have to admit that the GT with the Track Pack is a well sorted track vehicle and an excellent value.
Most Mustang fans focus so much on 0-60mph and 1/4 mile times but it does go around the track very well. Good tires, good brakes...it's a nice performance vehicle.
2 weeks ago, last edited 2 weeks ago
I'm going to try and make this quick and simple for you Eric. The 2011 Mustang has achieved .95 G's, equal to the X MR, and goes from 70-0 in 153ft VS the X MR's 162ft. The only track that the both of them have been tested on is Willow Springs; the Mustang was quicker by .8 seconds.
2 weeks ago
Road & Track recently tested a 10' Evo X MR touring.

0-60: 4.6sec
1/4: 13.2@ 103.6mph

The 08’ EVO X’s had a horrible tune from the factory but has since been corrected. Then run way quicker then the results posted here currently.

*For lost one assuming the Mustang GT will be faster because it tied the 08’ EVO X at VIR.

News Flash!

The EVO X is by the better performing track car and when you look at pretty much every other result besides that one at (VIR) you'd understand that a Mustang GT, 2011 or not doesn't stand a chance in hell against the EVO X MR unless you’re just talking about a ¼ mile drag race.
3 months ago
0-100 in 6sec??? why evo 9 better than 10? i just order 295ps 366nm version of evo x , quite disappointed i though i can get 100kmh in 4.7sec
4 months ago
Since the 2010 mustang tied this I wonder how well the 2011 would smash on this car.
7 months ago
With a Cobb AP stage 1 ecu upgrade and using launch control I get constant 0-60 times in the 4.2 sec range with the SST.
1 year ago
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X VS Subaru Impreza STi:


INTA (LONG and diferent TRACK):

Evo: 1 min 26,76 sec

STi: 1 min 26,74 sec


http://motor.terra.es/pruebas-coches/articulo/mitsubishi-lancer-evo-x-subaru-49063.htm


http://www.forocoches.com/foro/showthread.php?t=1317701&highlight=

2 years ago
@douglas C&D tested the Evo X MR SST in 5.3s 0-60mph... one gear shift more and longer acceleration from 96km/h(60mph) to 0-100km/h(62mph)ends in the acceleration off 6.0s 0-100km/h ...

The 1/4mile time tested from C&D and the europen (spanish) car magazine are nearly identical to 0.1s ....
2 years ago
@douglas C&D do not test 0-100km/h they test 0-60mph which is not 0-100km/h
2 years ago
Car&Driver tested this car to get from 0-100km/h in 4.7s?!
2 years ago
upsss; sorry, time of hockenheim short is ok.

2 years ago
One error in this page:

The EVO X MR time of Sport auto in hockenheim short is with dual-clutch automated manual transmission. No MANUAL.
2 years ago
Poor time; the dual-clutch automated manual transmission is pure garbage.

Excessive real mass ( more than 1600 kg)
4961 fastest lap times for 2571 cars from 218 manufacturers.
(c) Fastestlaps.com 2006-2010