FX50S technical data
Performance
Max speed
155 miles/h (250 km/h)
0-100 km/h
5.4 seconds
0-160 km/h
12.6 seconds
0-200 km/h
-
0-300 km/h
-
Quarter mile
13.6 seconds
0-100-0 mph
-
Engine
Power
287 kw (385hp / 390 ps)
Torque
500 Nm (369 Lb-Ft)
Displacement
5.0 liters liters
Engine type
32-valve V8
Engine location
front
General data
Gearbox
7speed automatic
Drive
AWD
Mass
2075 kilograms (4565 lbs)
Weight distribution
-
Year of introduction
2009
Home country
Japan
Calculations
Power to Weight ratio
185.48 hp/tonne
Power per liter
57 kw/liter
Fastestlaps.com stats
FL Rank
Position - 1158/1387, 0 points
Page views
474
Car submitted by
Unonamis
More FX50S photos
Track Time Position
Faster than Slower than
Community comments (16)
Unonamis 18/07/08, 14:47:14
This is the source of most of my info. http://www.caranddriver.com/buying_guide/infiniti/fx/2009_infini
ti_fx/2009_infiniti_fx50_short_take_road_test+type-reviews_by_make+t-specs+page-
3+mode-collection+id-270.html
Unonamis 18/07/08, 14:49:30
Hold on, weight should be 4,641 lbs. Please fix.
Georg 18/07/08, 17:26:37
FastestLaps 18/07/08, 17:58:38
Unonamis 21/07/08, 15:47:55
No one of course. Even performance-wise it's worse than the X6.
danielk 21/07/08, 16:13:21
In mz opinion the best SUV. I'm not that sure it's worse than x6
performance-wise either.
Unonamis 08/10/08, 01:32:47
It's the ugliest car on the planet.
Anonymous 08/10/08, 01:57:14
hell no it aint, how bout the land rover defender.
Anonymous 18/11/08, 16:44:57
What are u guys talking about it costing more than the X6??? Its actally $20k
cheeper where I live and performance is up to par with the X6, even though the
X6 has twin turbos........
FastestLaps 18/11/08, 17:05:49
“ performance is up to par with the X6, even
though the X6 has twin turbos...... ”
“ It's the ugliest car on the planet.
”
Anonymous 18/11/08, 18:50:50
maybe in ur eyes but the land rover defender will always have a lot of fans
where as this ...
Georg 18/11/08, 19:14:13
“ What are u guys talking about it costing
more than the X6??? Its actally $20k cheeper where I live and performance is up
to par with the X6, even though the X6 has twin
turbos........ ”
AUDI 04/01/09, 00:54:31
0-200 km/h = 19s ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RrGY4I219A&NR=1
Anonymous 04/01/09, 01:51:46
GEORGY is right about those facts and the X6,even though its a little heavy has
terrible numbers for a twin turbo. BMW does not impress me.
PhantomPorsche 04/01/09, 02:41:12
BumRush 04/01/09, 02:45:16
Add your comment
Which is faster?
Click here to compare two cars using the fastestlaps.com database!
They try to sell this for 80,000Euro($125,000) in Europe... for sure they will
fail badly.
... even X6 5.0i is cheaper. Who would rather buy one of these?
This car is pointless and so is the X6. It sucks at parking, practicality, off
road capability so why buy these kind of cars and buy a M5 touring.
the problem with BMW is they supposedly want or need to build a M series x car
but not a CS version of the 3!!
