FX50S technical data
Performance
Max speed
155 miles/h (250 km/h)
0-100 km/h
5.4 seconds
0-160 km/h
12.6 seconds
0-200 km/h
-
0-300 km/h
-
Quarter mile
13.6 seconds
0-100-0 mph
-
Engine
Power
287 kw (385hp / 390 ps)
Torque
500 Nm (369 Lb-Ft)
Displacement
5.0 liters liters
Engine type
32-valve V8
Engine location
front
General data
Gearbox
7speed automatic
Drive
AWD
Mass
2075 kilograms (4565 lbs)
Weight distribution
-
Year of introduction
2009
Home country
Japan
Calculations
Power to Weight ratio
185.48 hp/tonne
Power per liter
57 kw/liter
Fastestlaps.com stats
FL Rank
Position - 1158/1387, 0 points
Page views
474
Car submitted by
Unonamis
More FX50S photos
Track Time Position
Faster than Slower than
Community comments (16)
Unonamis
18/07/08, 14:47:14
This is the source of most of my info. http://www.caranddriver.com/buying_guide/infiniti/fx/2009_infini
ti_fx/2009_infiniti_fx50_short_take_road_test+type-reviews_by_make+t-specs+page-
3+mode-collection+id-270.html
Unonamis
18/07/08, 14:49:30
Hold on, weight should be 4,641 lbs. Please fix.
Georg
18/07/08, 17:26:37
They try to sell this for 80,000Euro($125,000) in Europe... for sure they will
fail badly.
FastestLaps
18/07/08, 17:58:38
... even X6 5.0i is cheaper. Who would rather buy one of these?
Unonamis
21/07/08, 15:47:55
No one of course. Even performance-wise it's worse than the X6.
danielk
21/07/08, 16:13:21
In mz opinion the best SUV. I'm not that sure it's worse than x6
performance-wise either.
Unonamis
08/10/08, 01:32:47
It's the ugliest car on the planet.
Anonymous
08/10/08, 01:57:14
hell no it aint, how bout the land rover defender.
Anonymous
18/11/08, 16:44:57
What are u guys talking about it costing more than the X6??? Its actally $20k
cheeper where I live and performance is up to par with the X6, even though the
X6 has twin turbos........
FastestLaps
18/11/08, 17:05:49
“ performance is up to par with the X6, even
though the X6 has twin turbos...... ”
Turbos on BMW new 5.0 V8 are not there for all-out performance (horsepower). The
same applies to BMW's 3.0 bi-turbo.
“ It's the ugliest car on the planet.
”
I do not agree. I even think it is quite good looking for an SUV.
Anonymous
18/11/08, 18:50:50
maybe in ur eyes but the land rover defender will always have a lot of fans
where as this ...
Georg
18/11/08, 19:14:13
“ What are u guys talking about it costing
more than the X6??? Its actally $20k cheeper where I live and performance is up
to par with the X6, even though the X6 has twin
turbos........ ”
we talk about the biggest car market on earth... the europen car market were
this car cost 5,000Euro (~$6,400) more than a BMW X6 V8 twinturbo
AUDI
04/01/09, 00:54:31
0-200 km/h = 19s ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RrGY4I219A&NR=1
Anonymous
04/01/09, 01:51:46
GEORGY is right about those facts and the X6,even though its a little heavy has
terrible numbers for a twin turbo. BMW does not impress me.
PhantomPorsche
04/01/09, 02:41:12
This car is pointless and so is the X6. It sucks at parking, practicality, off
road capability so why buy these kind of cars and buy a M5 touring.
BumRush
04/01/09, 02:45:16
the problem with BMW is they supposedly want or need to build a M series x car
but not a CS version of the 3!!
Add your comment
Which is faster?
Click here to compare two cars using the fastestlaps.com database!