2009 Cadillac CTS-V

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQPgrsT2bLM
:)

can anybody show a proof of that 11.9 seconds 1/4mile time?

Thats a matter of opinion, and they make SOME, not all.

european cars best in world...

mercedes e63 AMG,new BMW M5 thats all...
cady no...

Yeah, its also going to be 1 Million plus, and 900+bhp, yeah...Real fair...........

Watch, Bugatti is comming out with a faster 4 door than the cts-v..just wait

“from 97 km/h to 100 with 0,3 seconds??? i would do it faster with my bicycle. u can add some 0,1 seconds to 3,9 and 4,0 is the fair number. ”

I understand the point that you are making BUT the site doesn't want to guess the difference between 60mph and 100kph if there is a test from a source that gives 0-100kph. Some cars require a shift between 60mph and 62mph (which would add time) while some cars can stay in gear from 60mph to 62mph.

from 97 km/h to 100 with 0,3 seconds??? i would do it faster with my bicycle. u can add some 0,1 seconds to 3,9 and 4,0 is the fair number.

“From 0-60 is 4,2 seconds with manual gearbox. With automatic is 3,9.”
This site doesn't list 0-60mph. it lists 0-100 kph (roughly 62.14 mph)

that really sound strange a car making better acceleration on automatic gearbox...

From 0-60 is 4,2 seconds with manual gearbox. With automatic is 3,9. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zE7M-5YENS4 It is official car and driver test - so maybe it counts on this site too??

CTS-V IS SMOKING!!!

“11.9 second 1/4 mile for any stock car is insane let alone a cadillac doing it. cts-v is fastest 4 door car in the world. ”
...not true

http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezflow_site/storage/original/application/4bcd27177697b70692257df057ce0f16.pdf

11.9 second 1/4 mile for any stock car is insane let alone a cadillac doing it. cts-v is fastest 4 door car in the world.

why didn't anybody fix the 0-200 km/h of 13.4 seconds it was posted a while back and that would make it faster than the bmw m5 to 200 km/h so can somebody fix it considering it is faster than the m5.

*turns hose off*

damn flamethrowers...

"replace that heavy engine with a lighter one"

Do your homework. The engine in this car is actually very light weight. The V8 LS9 engine weighs less than the V6 engine used in the GTR.

Secondly, if they did everything you request they would end up with a non-luxury sedan that would cost far too much. The whole point of this car is for it to be fast luxury at a reasonable price.. which it does flawlessly.

If you're going to suggest a sports version, why not suggest it for the coupe? This is a sedan.

This car is very heavy. I suggest making it a 2 seater with bucket seats, replace that heavy engine with a lighter one ( perhaps saleen?) replace the panels with carbon fibre, plus the suspension. lightweight TSW rims, lower suspension, bigger brakes, semi slicks, new transmission, remove all the useless crap on the dashboard, and finally, throw it into a volcano. This car has a very very, veeeeeery small hint of handsom-ness, but other than that, BUT UGLY.
BTW: i am prepared for the torrent of american flamethrowers now pointed at my forehead.

sl55 0--300kph 32.5 secs

i found a better 0-300 km/h timehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VJTeNp4ueY it does not present a time but i recorded it to 35.8 seconds

that 0-200 km/h time has been bothering me for a long time and i finally found a better time can somebody change it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trEFwmdLUR8

“I still dont believe that link for a second. 0-300 is way faster than the time they posted.”

It probably is quicker to 300kph but since 0-300kph is rarely tested, the one that is given is the only one listed in the stats.

Eventually, another magazine will do a test and the time will probably improve.