|
Lancer Evo X MR technical data |
| Performance |
| Max speed |
150.04 miles/h (242 km/h) |
| 0-100 km/h |
6.1 seconds |
| 0-160 km/h |
13.8 seconds |
| 0-200 km/h |
- |
| 0-300 km/h |
- |
| Quarter mile |
13.8 seconds |
| 0-100-0 mph |
- |
| Engine |
| Power |
214 kw (287hp / 291 ps) |
| Torque |
407 Nm (300 Lb-Ft) |
| Displacement |
2.0 liters |
| Engine type |
inline 4 turbo 16V DOHC |
| Engine location |
Front |
| General data |
| Gearbox |
6 speed dual clutch |
| Drive |
awd |
| Mass |
1640 kilograms (3608 lbs) |
| Weight distribution |
58.2/41.8 |
| Year of introduction |
2008 |
| Home country |
Japan |
| Calculations |
| Power to Weight ratio |
175.01 hp/tonne |
| Power per liter |
107 kw/liter |
| Fastestlaps.com stats |
| FL Rank |
Position - 64/1312, 24 points |
| Page views |
2609 |
| Car submitted by |
Georg |
|
|
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X MR |
 
|
|
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X MR racing rivals |
| Lotus Elise S2, Nissan Skyline GT-R R34, Honda S2000, Honda Civic Type-R (EP3), Renault Clio 182, | Other cars by Mitsubishi (35) | | Lancer EVO IX, Lancer Evo VIII, Evo VII, Lancer Evo VI, Colt CZT, Eclipse, Galant VR-4, Outlander 2.0 DI-D, GTO MR, Lancer GSR Evo X, GTO MR (Mk II), Lancer RS Evolution II, GTO MR (Mk III), Lancer 2.0 DI-D, FTO GPX, Evo VIII FQ400, Lancer Evolution IX MR FQ-360, Lancer GTS, Outlander 2.4 4WD, Lancer Ralliart, Evo X RS, Evo IX FQ 340, Evo VIII FQ 300, Evo VIII MR FQ 320, Lancer Evo VIII MR FQ 340, Lancer Evo IX GSR, Lancer Evo X FQ300 SST, Outlander 2.2 DI-D, Lancer Evolution Wagon, EVO X MR (dual-clutch automated manual transmission), Evo X FQ 360, Evo IX MR FQ 320, Colt Ralliart Version-R Special, Lancer Evolution I GSR, LancerEvolution III GSR,
|
|
|
Which is faster? |
| Click here to compare two cars using the fastestlaps.com database! |
|
according to sportauto the slow laptimes compared to the Evo IX and older EVo´s
is only because of the increased weight and extrem hot tarmac temperature the
Evo X MR was equipped with SST
I added a time for Evo X MR at Leguna Seca by MotorTrend. Source: 