2008 Dodge Viper SRT-10 ACR |
   
|
|
|
Dodge Viper SRT-10 ACR racing rivals |
| Ferrari F50, Ascari KZ1, RUF CTR Yellow Bird, Lamborghini Diablo GT, Mosler MT 900S, |
Other cars by Dodge (20) | | Viper SRT-10, Charger SRT-8, Viper GTS, Viper SRT-10 (600hp), Viper RT/10, Caliber SRT4, Challenger SRT-8, Viper ACR, Viper SRT-10 Roadster, Viper GT2, Charger R/T Daytona, Viper SRT-10 Roadster, Ram SRT-10, Charger R/T Daytona, Charger V6, Charger R/T, Viper RT/10, Charger Daytona, Neon SRT-4, Viper SRT-10 ACR 1:33 Edition (Revised gearing, shifter, wing),
|
Associated videos (2) | Viper ACR vs Corvette ZR1 at The Nurburgring SRT-10 ACR vs LP-560 (both stock)
|
Community comments (304)
|
|
Viper SRT-10 ACR technical data |
| Performance |
| Max speed |
176.08 miles/h (284 km/h) |
| 0-100 km/h |
- |
| 0-160 km/h |
8.0 seconds |
| 0-200 km/h |
- |
| 0-300 km/h |
- |
| Quarter mile |
11.07 @ 129mph seconds |
| 0-100-0 mph |
- |
| Engine |
| Power |
441 kw (592 bhp / 600 ps) |
| Torque |
759 Nm (562 lb-ft) |
| Displacement |
8.4 liters |
| Engine type |
V-10, 2 valves per cylinder |
| Engine location |
Front |
| General data |
| Gearbox |
6 |
| Drive |
Rear Wheel Drive |
| Mass |
1536 kilograms (3379 lbs) |
| Weight distribution |
- |
| Year of introduction |
2008 |
| Home country |
United States |
| Calculations |
| Power to Weight ratio |
385.28 hp/tonne |
| Power per liter |
52.54 kw/liter |
| Fastestlaps.com stats |
| FL Rank |
Position - 1207/1206, 0 points |
| Page views |
48013 |
| Car submitted by |
unknown |
|
More Viper SRT-10 ACR photos |
 |  |  |  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One track is an oval, so it's no surprise that the Viper loses, and the other is small gap.
“keep Fiat and Ferrari away from everything on the Viper!!! ”
For the most part, I agree, many things Ferrari don't belong in a Viper. However, they seem to have invested more development in those areas I mentioned. Chrysler could develop better systems on their own, but it would probably cost more and take longer to develop on their own, just because Ferrari has existing technology.
“It really needs more technology in the next gen, but the exterior is perfect, i hope that they make it even better. ”
It's not really lacking technology. It just doesn't care for things that won't help it go fast or things that allow it to drive itself.
For example, the only reason they added ABS was because the car was at a performance disadvantage without it.
That said, the Viper's transmission and aero are subpar. In the case of the former, it's not just terrible gearing, but long shift times compared to modern cars. I think those two areas are where Fiat/Ferrari should be allowed to step in. Everywhere else, I say keep it as it's been done. Also, make more models that aren't about being low cost. I can only imagine the performance from a $200,000 Viper.
This car is very fast! :-D
1/4 mile: imperical
trap speed: imperical
0-100-0 mph: imperical
Yeah, it would be completely out of charactor to have a 0-60mph time and the USA clearly has no impact on auto testing standards. *rollseyes*
“Anonymous 1 hour ago [Delete] [Ban IP]
And there are 385,000,000 peopl in that nation, and i think thats all the reason you need to add it.”
that are ~4.5% of the world population, not a realy a big important number ;)
Maybe FL can add a simple conversion chart so people won't complain when they see "4.2 sec 0-100kph" when they KNOW the car can do 4.0 sec.....0-60 mph.
Japan, Germany, Korea, France, Italy, China use all metric system...