1992 Jaguar XJ220

Photo of Jaguar XJ220

Fastest Lap Times (2)

Add laptime for "XJ220"   Add photo
TrackTimePosition Faster thanSlower than
Bedford Autodrome West Circuit (post 06/2008)1:26.726/72Audi TT-RS Coupe Audi R8 
Nordschleife7:46.3737/228Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano Lamborghini Gallardo Superleggera 

Jaguar XJ220 racing rivals

Chevrolet Corvette Z06, Ford GT, Ferrari F430, McLaren Mercedes SLR, Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano,

Other cars by Jaguar (32)

XKR, XKR, S-Type R, S-Type 3.0, XK Convertible, XJR, XK8, XJR-15, XJR, XKR convertible, E-type Series 1 3.8l, E-type Series 1½ 4.2l, XJ-6 3.0, XJ220S TWR, XF SV8, XF 2.7D, S-Type Diesel, XK60 Special Edition, XKR-S, XJ-6 2.7D, XF-R, XK (385 bhp), XKR (510 bhp), ... show more

Community comments (30)

Heyhuub 3 years ago
This lap was done on slicks if i remember correctly.

Marco 3 years ago
No, i think the lap is on road tire. Here the reference www.jwhubbers.nl/ring/docs/evo-0007-7.jpg

Heyhuub 3 years ago
No, i remember the whole article stated that it was on slick tires. Not totally sure, but it would be more logical.

FelipeOfBrazil 3 years ago
Heyhuub,the crucial difference of the time of this Jaguar for the others here the driver,most of times Sport Auto have .... Look too Honda NSX-R/Kurosawa e a new time of a New Skyline GT-R (sorry the english) Have done professional drivers...

DJ 2 years ago
This lap is a full lap, if compared to the other times here you could use a time 6 seconds faster, 7.40 would be comparable to the other cars that only ran 20,6 km. Pretty impressive considering the age of that car!!!

rice 2 years ago
dude 0-100 mph is NOT 9.9 it 7.3 huuuge difference

Wads 2 years ago
Rice give me a link to the 7.3 0-100 time and I'll change it..... I've seen various sources saying 8sec but nothing as quick as 7.3

rice 2 years ago
here 1...http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/Jaguar/1993/XJ220/...another..http://www. exoticcarsite.com/pages/jaguar_xj220-2.htm..oooo anotha..http://www.ultimasports.co.uk/records/poster2lr.pdf

Anonymous 2 years ago
I have also read a test with 0-200 in 10.6 seconds. But its not on the web, so I have no proof. But we have all seen it beat the Pagani Zonda at Top Gear, and it does 0-200 in 11,2.....

anonymous 11 months ago
This car has never been on top gear

anonymous 11 months ago
my mistake, yes it has.

Anonymous 11 months ago
Jeremy Clarkson on the XJ220
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&vid eoid=4528465

Anonymous 11 months ago
yes, and the 0-124 is wrng on this car too, since it passes the 1/4 mile in 11.7 at 125mph.....

Jagman 10 months ago
This lap time was done on standard road tires: Bridgestone Expedia 5.01 255/45ZR17-front,345/35ZR18-rear.
Top speed is wrong!It can do 212.3 mph(341.7 km/h) and it can hit 223 mph (359km/h) only whit removed catalytic converters!

Wads 10 months ago
Assume you mean the Nurburgring time?

Jagman 7 months ago
Yes.If you want,check this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNDzQPzd1aQ It is the official promotional video,maded during car test on Nordschleife.John Nielsen set this time...by the way,he was the main test driver for XJ220 program.

Georg 7 months ago
interesting question is now how Nissan come to the idea to claim Ring production car lap records with their R33 and R34 GT-R´s after this existing laptime which is better than any R33 or R34 ever laptime

Georg 7 months ago
and a other question is what could a XJ220 do on 2009 tire technology? Pretty sure it could shave some 10seconds form that laptime if not more

Anonymous 7 months ago
i think the XJ220's time of 7:46 was dn in 2000 somthing, while the R33 was set in the 90's..i think? but considering the Jag was br in the 90's the time shold go to it.

Anonymous 7 months ago
and im actually surprised it only sold for GB150,000!! thought it would be around GB275,000..

Georg 7 months ago
anonymous don´t think so the guys were wearing typical late 80´s early 90´s fashion... and why should Jaguar do a promotion video for a car out of production in 2000...thats completely pointless

Russell Mills 7 months ago
The weight of the car is all wrong, the XJ220 weighed only 1,375KG (not 1,555kg) as per the Autocar official road test in the early 90's so the power to weight should be 394BHP per ton. I agree with the other comments, it was a longer circuit and with modern tyre tech you could lose about 16 seconds off the laptime for nowdays.

Plus the Nordy lap time was definatley in the early 90's and not 2000.

Lovely car (if a bit wide)

.... 5 months ago
if it will come to compare the performance of this car to a modern one, what car would be ?... it's hard to find info about this car.

BumRush 5 months ago
Pagani Zonda C12-S
Ascari KZ1
Saleen Mustang SR
Audi R8 V10

Those would be some Modern Rivals for this car.

Pages:    1  2  Next

Add your comment

1. Your name
2. Comment
Remaining character count: 1500
Enter (verification)

XJ220 technical data

Performance
Max speed 219.48 miles/h (354 km/h)
0-100 km/h 3.8 seconds
0-160 km/h 7.3 seconds
0-200 km/h 12.2 seconds
0-300 km/h -
Quarter mile 11.7 seconds
0-100-0 mph -
Engine
Power 404 kw (542 bhp / 549 ps)
Torque 641.4 Nm (475 lb-ft)
Displacement 3.5 liters
Engine type 3.5 V6 Twin-Turbocharged
Engine location Mid
General data
Gearbox 5
Drive Rear
Mass 1555 kilograms (3421 lbs)
Weight distribution -
Year of introduction 1992
Home country UK
Calculations
Power to Weight ratio 348.49 hp/tonne
Power per liter 115.46 kw/liter
Fastestlaps.com stats
FL Rank Position - 1207/1206, 0 points
Page views 9175
Car submitted by unknown

Add a car   |  Add lap time   |  Submit an article (c) Fastestlaps.com 2006-2010 4370 fastest lap times for 2397 cars from 234 manufacturers.

Unregistered users online: 38
RSS Feed