No, i remember the whole article stated that it was on slick tires. Not totally
sure, but it would be more logical.
FelipeOfBrazil
25/10/07, 00:32:24
Heyhuub,the crucial difference of the time of this Jaguar for the others here
the driver,most of times Sport Auto have ....
Look too Honda NSX-R/Kurosawa e a new time of a New Skyline GT-R
(sorry the english)
Have done professional drivers...
DJ
06/03/08, 13:59:13
This lap is a full lap, if compared to the other times here you could use a time
6 seconds faster, 7.40 would be comparable to the other cars that only ran 20,6
km. Pretty impressive considering the age of that car!!!
here
1...http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/Jaguar/1993/XJ220/...another..http://www.
exoticcarsite.com/pages/jaguar_xj220-2.htm..oooo
anotha..http://www.ultimasports.co.uk/records/poster2lr.pdf
Anonymous
18/03/08, 16:32:02
I have also read a test with 0-200 in 10.6 seconds.
But its not on the web, so I have no proof.
But we have all seen it beat the Pagani Zonda at Top Gear, and it does 0-200 in
11,2.....
Add your comment
Which is faster?
Click here to compare two cars using the fastestlaps.com database!
Rice give me a link to the 7.3 0-100 time and I'll change it..... I've seen
various sources saying 8sec but nothing as quick as 7.3
