996 Turbo S technical data
Performance
Max speed
190.34 miles/h (307 km/h)
0-100 km/h
4.2 seconds
0-160 km/h
-
0-200 km/h
-
0-300 km/h
-
Quarter mile
11.9 seconds
0-100-0 mph
-
Engine
Power
331 kw (444hp / 450 ps)
Torque
620 Nm (457 Lb-Ft)
Displacement
3.6 liters
Engine type
Boxer 6, Twin Turbo, 24v
Engine location
Rear
General data
Gearbox
6
Drive
All wheel drive
Mass
1540 kilograms (3388 lbs)
Weight distribution
-
Year of introduction
2004
Home country
Germany
Calculations
Power to Weight ratio
288.23 hp/tonne
Power per liter
92 kw/liter
Fastestlaps.com stats
FL Rank
Position - 194/1387, 4 points
Page views
1614
Car submitted by
unknown
Porsche 996 Turbo S racing rivals
BMW M5 (E60) , Lamborghini Gallardo , Porsche 997 Turbo , Ferrari F355 , Lamborghini Diablo , Other cars by Porsche (80) Carrera GT , 997 Turbo , 997 Carrera S , 997 GT3 , Cayman S , 996 GT3 RS , 996 GT2 , 986 Boxster S (262bhp) , 993 Carrera , 997 Carrera 4 , 993 GT2 , 996 GT3 late , 996 Turbo , 964 Carrera RS N/GT , 964 Carrera RS 3.8 , 987 Boxster , 968 Club Sport , 968 TurboS , 928 GTS , 964 TurboS , 993 Turbo (3.6) , 996 Carrera 4S , 996 Carrera , 996 GT3 early , Cayman 2.7 , 997 Carrera , 944 TurboS , 928 S4 , 930 Turbo 3.0 1975 , 986 Boxster (225bhp) , 997 Carrera S Cabrio , 997 GT3 RS , 959 , 997 Carrera Cabriolet , 996 Carrera 320hp , 987 Boxster S (276bhp) , 996 Carrera 4 , 993 Carrera Cabrio , 986 Boxster (201bhp) , 986 Boxster S (248bhp) , 987 Boxster S (291bhp) , 997 GT2 , 997 Turbo Cabriolet , Cayenne Turbo , 997 Carrera 4S , 993 Carrera RS , 964 Turbo 3.6 , 964 Carrera , 911 GT1 (993) , Cayenne S , 928 GT , 924 S , Cayenne Turbo (Mk II) , Cayenne GTS (Mk II) , Schuppan 962CR , 996 Turbo S Cabriolet , Boxster RS 60 Spyder , Cayenne Turbo S (MkII) , GT1 Evo , GT1 , 997 Carrera S (2008 facelift) , 997 Carrera (2008 facelift) , Cayenne , Carrera RS 2.7 , 993 Carrera 4S , 964 Carrera RS , 964 Speedster , 964 Carrera RS 3.8 , 993 Turbo 3.6 factory kit , 996 Carrera 345PS factory kit , 911S Targa , 997 Carrera 4S (facelift) , 997 911 Targa 4S (facelift) , Cayman S Sport , Cayenne S Transsyberia , Boxster S (facelift) , Cayman S(facelift) PDK , Panamera S , Panamera , Panamera Turbo ,
Community comments (11)
GTR
13/09/07, 15:13:40
1/4 Mile: 11.9 sec. http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suv/163_0310_porsche_cayenne
_turbo_9
11_x50/specs_price.html#Scene_2
Anonymous
10/09/08, 08:05:44
is this bedford autodome time the real deal? cause i find it a lil hard to
believe this 996 911 turbo beat the Porsche Carrera GT Mclaren F1 and a Ferrari
Enzo and a Nissan GT-R R35 round that track, it just seems a lil odd.
A156
22/09/08, 17:31:34
The reference is good but I also can't belive that 1:19.5. Maybe the conditions
were perfect or EVO had a better driver to test the cars. I also suspect that
the track was a bit shorter or somehow different from the track where Enzo and
GTR were tested; I saw the times in that article http://www.radicalsportscars.com/media/trackdaycar03/index.php
a> and all cars were about 2-3 seconds faster than I would bet! Btw, many cars
from that link are not on FastestLaps in Bedford Autodrome West Circuit (pre
06/2008) list.
A156
22/09/08, 17:32:06
http://www.radicalsportscars.com/media/trackdaycar03/index.php
a>
A156
24/09/08, 11:09:34
Anybody knows something more about that time at Bedford?
Anonymous
24/09/08, 20:14:53
It was probably set on the 2004 track. I have an old EVO from then and the track
was slightly shorter. That time is between Porsche 911 GT3 1:19.40 and BMW M3
CSL 1:19.95
A156
24/09/08, 20:45:58
The link says about the Trackday Car of the Year 2003. Are you sure about the
track length? In that case we must delete that 1:19.5 or (better) make a new
form of Bedford circuit and adding the cars from that event.
Anonymous
24/09/08, 21:03:09
EVO from October 2004 has new times and says that the track was recently revised
and is now up to 1.8 miles from 1.7
FastestLaps
27/09/08, 13:58:07
I removed 996 Turbo S Bedford time along with others from this http://www.radicalsportscars.com/media/trackdaycar03/index.php
a> test. Because, apparently, the track they used in 2003 was shorter than that
of all the other tests.
Heyhuub
27/09/08, 18:47:16
why?
FastestLaps
27/09/08, 18:48:31
Because, apparently, the track they used in 2003 was shorter than that of all
the other tests.
Add your comment
Which is faster?
Click here to compare two cars using the fastestlaps.com database!