2004 Citroen C2 VTS

C2 VTS; Echappement performances test Scan:

http://www.forum-auto.com/uploads/200412/will88_1102720997_comparatif_c2_saxo.jpg

My sister had one, they seem to rev forever with a little hiss at about 5500rpm, no torque whatsoever and the gear action is crap, too long with a poor quality spindly feel. Out on the roads it wasn't much slower than my Fiesta ST at the time, but way less fun due to the lack of torque.

The 0-160 time is good...

8.3 in the brochure.

I can get 0-62 faster in my wheelie bin and it's better build quality

Whoever took 8.9 seconds to get to 100kph needs a driving lesson! 8.0s

mys 8.0s 0 - 100 km and will b faster sn

all i gota say ppl is this car beats alot of cars. and how much is it ? nt much 4 the speed ur gettin and looks! this cars good!

In the Right hands, cars can be much quicker than people think, but im not sure of Citroen forever Nick..lol

C2 vts is a very good car and it can be very fast!Is fast but not enough.France and Citroen for ever!!

even the 138hp version from the Citroen tuner Musketier reaches only 8.5s 0-100km/h and 24.1s 0-160km/h

how is that possible? This car was tested in 2005 by sportauto and they only reached disapointing 9.4s 0-100km/h and even more disapointing 25.3s 0-160km/h

I have c2 vts and my c2 has 7,2 0-100 :P

Who cares, this look great!

Yes its a slow car.

HA HA HA! 8,9s 0-100 km/h