Does not matter. They are gone now. Somebody just want to compromise this
project but there is obviously no way. And it just makes me more willing to add
a better administration system and ability for other administrators (who wants
to be an administrator?) to administrade not only me.
can any body verify if this is true or not i realllly need to know heres the
link....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_SLR_McLaren.........it
says....The German magazine Auto Motor und Sport, in 2004, tested the SLR at the
Nardo test track in southern Italy. They reported that the SLR accelerates from
0 to 100 km/h (62 mph) in 3.2 seconds, 200 km/h (124 mph) in 9.5 seconds, and
300 km/h (186 mph) in 24.4 seconds. The car's 400-meter time and 1 km time were
found to be 10.5 seconds at 228 km/h (142 mph), and 18.5 seconds at 310 km/h
(193 mph), respectively. They also reached its claimed 360 km/h (224 mph) top
speed.
that topspeed claim is wrong the SLR was never reached 350km/h in a real
topspeed test...
Auto motor sport real numbers
Nardo test 2004.. 0-100km/h 3.8s, 0-200km/h 10.7s, 400m 11.5s, 1km 20.5s, real
reached topspeed 334km/h
Nardo test 2006 .. 0-100km/h 3.8s, 0-200km/h 11.2s, 0-300km/h 36.9s, topspeed
324km/h (high temperature ruined topspeed)
2007 test by Sportscars ..0-100km/h 3.9s, 0-200km/h 11.1s, 0-300km/h 36.3s,
topspeed 334km/h
This car looks 10times better in person and its awesome but i do not really
consider it a sports car whatsoever w(hich justifies the slower nurburgring
time(i guess)but why is this car so expensive?If it was carbon fibre that would
give it more greater times and justify the cost, so why the high price?
Anonymous
18/11/08, 07:23:53
how does not being a sports car justify th so-called slower lap time??
Add your comment
Which is faster?
Click here to compare two cars using the fastestlaps.com database!