2003 Ferrari 360 CS

Ferrari 360

power, tested weight (with fuel), tested acceleration 0-100 / 100-200 / 200-240 km/h, tested top speed:

360 Modena (1999-2004)
400 ps, 1427 kg (95 l), 4.5 s / 10.7 s / 8.8 s, 298 km/h

Challenge Stradale (2003-2004)
425 ps, 1365 kg (95 l), 4.3 s / 10.0 s / 8.4 s, 300 km/h

(100-200 km/h in 10.0s from quattroruote2003)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w26TGk4ZCz4&feature=related

This vid of a laptime 1:02.4...
I repeat its not a 360 Challenge Stradale its a 360 Challenge trackday car with 400hp and spoilers.

Track conditions.

I am confused how can this car be faster than the GTR spec-v but be slower than regular GTR on the same track.

s there any reference for the acceleration datas? The best I could find are:
0-100: 4,1 s
0-160: 9,7 s
0-200: 15,5 s
I know that this car can do better than my datas, but 4 s, 8,4 s and 13,6 s seem a bit optimistic for me.

I was wondering the same thing though, 8.4 to 100mph? the best i could find was 9.4, but 13.6 to 124mph is believable.

Is there any reference for the acceleration datas? The best I could find are:
0-100: 4,1 s
0-160: 9,7 s
0-200: 15,5 s
I know that this car can do better than my datas, but 4 s, 8,4 s and 13,6 s seem a bit optimistic for me.

The most beautiful looking and sounding Ferrari ever...

What's the source of Ferrari 360 CS acceleration listed (4.0/8.4/13.6 s to 100/160/200 km/h)?

I think the Viper would be on Michelin Pilot ZP's. They didn't get Pilot Sports until 2008. Also, seems kind of slow being behing a 575, but I guess it's possible.

Ferrari 360 CS 1'39"85 on Autozeitung track, tested together with
Porsche 996 GT3 RS 1'39"27, both on Pirelli PZero Corsa. AZ issue 23/2003. Conditions must have been pretty bad...

AZ 5/2004 comparison lists
Gallardo 500ps 1'37"8 (Pirelli Rosso),
Ferrari 575M MAranello F1 1'38"8 (Pirelli Rosso),
Viper SRT-10 1'39"9 (Michelin Pilot Sport).

SkyLines better than the 360 anyway. the cs just happens to have mo power and a lighter weight, and costs $100,000 more. but what would happen if you put that $100,000 in the M-Spec??? bye bye Ferrari...(not that i dont like thCS or anything)..

(sarcasm) nice names yo, anyhoo dude why do you keep changing your name?? i know oyur the same person who's commenting this, i dont care im just saying.

wow ferrari has out done them selves look i know evryones talking about its succsecor the ferrari 430 scuderia lapping the ferrari test track quicker than the enzo (fiorano circuit)but what about their presuccesors history is repeting its self well the ferrari 360 challenge stradale is less than half the price of a ferrari f50 and the ferrari 360cs laps the ferrari test track (fiorano circuit) quicker than a ferrari f50

wow ferrari has out done them selves look i know evryones talking about its succsecor the ferrari 430 scuderia lapping the ferrari test track quicker than the enzo (fiorano circuit)but what about their presuccesors history is repeting its self well the ferrari 360 challenge stradale is less than half the price of a ferrari f50 and the ferrari 360cs laps the ferrari test track (fiorano circuit) quicker than a ferrari f50

wow this car looks sexy the ferrari 360cs looks so hot in those stripes

what!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 7.56 round the nurburgring that doesnt sound right the stupid skyline r34 went round thenurburgring quicker than a ferrari 360cs

damn 7.56 round the nurburgring i would have guesed like the low 7.40s round the nurburgring competing with the porsche 911 gt3 and the the porsche 911 turbo thats what the ferrari 360cs should be gettin compettition from not the skyline r33 and the viper i mean cmon the 360cs only wieghs 2816lbs why cant it get into the low 7.40s like the 911 gt3 the 360cs got great lap times on the tsukuba of only 1min2sec thats really good quicker than the current 997 gen code name prsche 911 gt2 round the tsukuba the 911 gt2 gos round the nurburgring in 7.32 the reason for this is the 911 gt2 has 530hp and the 360cs is only 425hp the 360cs also went round the top gear track quicker than th last generation early 2000s porsche 911 996 gt3 rs the lap time was only 1.22.3 round the top gear track

wow that qauter mile time is amazing only 12.1secs she takes 4.0secs to get 60mph and how does she do it so quick with only 425hp im guessin its because shes so light i mean she only wieghs 2816lbs thats like nothin man the aerio dynamics must be good cause the 360cs is so smooth and she looks great to her 12.1 quatermile time is like only 1sec of the ferrari enzos qauter mile time of 11 secs

not many people comented this car the ferrari 360 challenge stradale is really really good im very impressed in the corners this car could just zoom through them caus shes only 2816lbs then again i like this car but shes not all that quick on striaghts this verses the enzo the 360 could probaley corner way quicker but then again the enzo would smoke this car on the striaghts overall speaking the enzo is the winner but i still prefer the 360 cs because shes lighter and she looks allot better and shes way cheaperthan the enzo the enzo coasts 645 000 usd and the 360cs is only 240 000 usd (only when new)

Yeah its stock..But the 360 Challange on this video its a diferent to 360 Challenge Stradale...
400ps vs 425ps...Spoilers...
Etc..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Biy2YgzK2Nk
The time in Tsukuba was on Pirelli 's P-zero corsa s-tyres. Does anyone know what are stock tyres of this baby?

i see. i just need to know the date of that dvd release. I guess i have that one at home... if someone knows please tell me ;)

This laptime was quoted by best motoring as the curret "production car laprecord" as they went with the Nismo R34 GT-R Z-Tune on the track for a time attack run. There was a video compare by best motoring were they show inbord views of both cars in compare.
At youtube they always delet BM videos for copyright reasons :(