|
||
Log in / RegisterRecently added carsRecent lap times
YoungSinatra: OOOH NO! THE 458 is being recalled for catching on FIRE!! Appears to be a simple fix. I'll still wa... ThatDamnDrunk: @Georg and Man1 Yeah Sport Auto is the best. Hourst Von Saurma is great, he lapped the ring in a ... monkeypop: http://www .youtube.c om/watch?v =VqZO-xURL qc Drifting the ring... monkeypop: 0-60 in 4.9 seconds. This is major fail for TRD.... Monkfg : At least it doesn't catch fire like the 458 italia.... |
2 years ago
Cars are just getting fatter and less interesting Is it only me, or do you find increasingly that the new cars coming out are generally a step backwards in many ways than their predecessors? Take this months issue of EVO. There wasn't a single car driven in their new car section that really grabbed me. The new E Class was a prime example. Bigger, more complex and safer than the old one, but somehow it seems that the driver is even more removed. The NCAP programme has much to blame, adding increasing weight as manufacturers chase ever harder targets.
Cars just get bigger and stiffer. There's too much kit packed into modern cars and in a bid to make them "user friendly", they are removing the layer of driver interaction by giving us vague and over-light steering. I am not sure in the real world that cars are even that much faster. Anyone who watched last seasons fifth gear can't have failed to notice that the 1988 Ford Escort RS Turbo, in damp conditions on the twisty narrow MIRA track, which would seem to replicate your average B road quite well, was very close in time to the brand new BMW 123D and Audi TT Diesel, despite being way down on power and brakes! Bikes of course are going in the other direction - losing weight, getting quicker, but of course they don't have to pass an NCAP Test. Nope, I feel quite disillusioned with the current state of affairs. Sure the newer cars with their light pressure turbo's give their performance easier, but all this Nurburgring lap chasing is bringing us rock hard suspension and reducing body roll to the extent that chasing the limit is hard. I recall a drive in a new Leon FR Diesel last year. Initially it felt very taut and very grippy, making me chase cornering speeds faster. Then I tipped into a downhill left hander and the back end stepped out without warning and the front end too lost grip. The slip from grip to no grip was so quick, I had little time to react. Take my old mk1 Focus, that I keep harping on about. It has some body roll and great steering and is very easy to drive up to and on the limit. In fact in the wet you can almost drift it on the limit around corners. It tells you whats going on. In fact, apart from perhaps the current MK2 Focus, I doubt there is a family hatch out there that actually drives as well or better than my old Mk1, in terms of pure handling and responsiveness. And all the MK2 Focus did was put on 100KG and gain a bit more power and some fatter tyres! No, if I had £22,000 now I would not be buying the new MK6 Golf GTI, which for me doesn't move the game on from the MK5. I would buy an £11k second hand Renault Megane R26 and a Honda FireBlade and some bike lessons with the change! If you want real thrills with your speed and want to be totally involved in the process, it seems maybe you need two wheels these days. Community comments (17) |
Quick Vote (Beta)Best known carsPopular race tracks |
|
4961 fastest lap times for 2571 cars from 218 manufacturers.
(c) Fastestlaps.com 2006-2010
|
||
I think best cars came from 80's and 90's.
Yes there is allso new nice looking cars too but I prefer older like f40,f50,993 gt2 , venturi....
Since cars are generally getting faster due to advances in technology, that should also mean that safety should be increased?
For example I have heard a story from my local BMW dealership that a client of theirs has brought three 530i in a period of three years, because of safety. He has had three of them because he crashed these cars doing over 130kph, and walked away with no injuries. There is no way that the current 530i is slower than the previous, due to safety. Slower due to safety restrictions? No way!
Actually Corvettes haven't changed much in dimensions including weight since the '60s.
Fiberforge.com / rmi.com has some interesting stuff on keeping the size the same while dumping the weight.
Luxury sedans, Cadillacs, etc had huge chrome bumpers and looked heavy, but again are at less 1000lbs less than now. A 6.1L McLaren F1 weighed 2400lbs and a 6.2L Corvette weighs 3200lbs. There is too much safety crap getting in the way.
People think that they won't crash, not that they'll crash and walk away.
Now, back on to the subject of this article, I'd have to agree. Some are so loaded with "driving interaction technologies", that they weigh as much as a two tons or more. Then, to counter the weight, they give the car 400 hp, which sucks on fuel efficiency!
The only problem with motorcycles is that they can kill you very very easily and unexpectedly. Take my recent truck wheel collision for example. Can you imagine what could have happened if I was on a bike? And there is no way of predicting and eliminating such risks. And wild animals randomly jumping out of forests across the highway are much much bigger risk. Especially where I live.
Having said that, motorcycles are the only lifeline left for those motorists who want the ultimate man and machine experance and ultimate adrenaline rush. And you don't have to be a millionaire to have all that on two wheels.