Login area

Username:

Password:

Auto login:
Recently added cars
•  Shelby Mustang Cobra GT500 SuperSnake (0)
•  Ford Flex (0)
•  Lincoln MKS (0)
•  Hyundai Azera (0)
•  Mazda RX-8 R3 (1)
•  Nissan Skyline GTS-T R32 (1)
•  JetStream SC250 (0)
•  GraberCars La Bala I4 (0)
•  Aeon GT3 Spyder (0)
•  Ford Transit (0)
•  Jaguar S-Type Diesel (0)
•  Brilliance BC3 Coupe (0)
•  Toyota Yaris T-Sport (1)
•  Seat Ibiza 1.9 Tdi Sport (1)
•  Skoda Octavia vRS (1)
Recently added times
•  Mazda RX-8 R3
   0:44.51 @ Millbrook Handling Circuit
•  Dodge Viper SRT-10 ACR
   39.89 @ El Toro
•  Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4
   40.29 @ El Toro
•  Porsche 997 GT2
   40.61 @ El Toro
•  Nissan GT-R
   40.63 @ El Toro
•  Audi R8
   41.12 @ El Toro
•  Chevrolet Corvette Z06
   41.82 @ El Toro
Forum theads
> road & track 2008 tests (3)
> Autocar august 2003 Britain's Best handling car (8)
> laptime sources pool (35)
> Add 0-100mph (0-160kph) to the comparison (1)
> track langth? (14)
> Hi. I've some times from autozeitung (2)
> size? (2)
> New Track - Sepang Malaysia (2)
> New Fuji Raceway should be added (2)
> Add car BHP error (6)

Recent comments

•  man1: i am the anonymous above (assuming that uniquely determined :)). my sources claim that 7 of the gt1 ...

•  Georg: sure it is impossible in stock trim for a 212hp 2772lbs car to get in 15.1s 0-100-0mph...

•  Anonymous: 1779 kg? And I thought the standard Mustang GT was a bit heavy at 1580kg......

•  Anonymous: I..I wouldnt say IMPOSSIBLE but i understand what your saying.....

•  A156: I think we must add the word "new" or something to seperate it from the 2005 Vantage. Both cars have...

•  FastestLaps: You may consider registerin g your nick to prevent anyone else from using it....

•  TheRealUnonamis: Someone used my name. DELETE THIS PAGE...

•  Heyhuub: Sorry, yeah that's supposed to be the 1/4 mile time....

•  Georg: 15.1s 0-100-0 with 212hp impossible ..is that the 1/4mile time put into the wrong section? 15.1s 0-10...

•  Anonymous: these new pdk are somthing else. imagine what the new 997 911 Turbo and the 997 911 GT3 and the 997 ...

•  Anonymous: its all the same, a straight line is a straight line. but come on if that zo6 can reach those numbe...

•  Anonymous: o my bad sorry;)...

Wads on Sportscars: BMW M3 E92

29.05.2008
As I've been in the market for a new car recently I have been test driving a lot of nice hardware, one of the best was the new BMW M3 Coupe (6 speed manual) which I had for three days.

The new M3 is not that exciting from the outside and doesn't stand out as being an “M” car in the way that previous versions do, most people will probably think its just another 3 Series. However those that know their cars will notice the flared wheel arches, black carbon roof, chrome wing badges and “power dome” on the bonnet. Some don't like it but I actually prefer the slightly understated looks of the new model.

Colour wise the car I had was the Melbourne Red which isn't a colour I'd choose….. its ok as reds go but looked a little dull to my eye. On the coupe the carbon fiber roof does look very nice even though its not as big a weight saving feature as BMW would have us believe (the sedan only weighs a little more than the coupe and it doesn't have the carbon roof).

On any colour other than black the roof really does make it clear the car is an M3, maybe that's why white M3 Coupes are selling very well at the moment? The car I tested had the optional 19” wheels which most buyers seem to choose, I personally prefer the standard dark graphite double spoke 18” which are actually lighter weight (reduced unsprung weight marginally improving the handling) and mean looking on darker coloured exteriors.

Interior - in a word dull! The best thing I can say about the cabin is that it is functional...

To me the interior of the M3 looks almost exactly the same as any other 3 series BMW, sure it has lots of gadgets and leather but it lacks the flair of an Audi interior. Maybe the fact that this car had black everywhere didn't help and I would definitely choose something different if buying one myself (more on that later)!

The best thing I can say about the cabin is that it is functional, the seats are very comfortable and adjust in almost every way you could want and come with electronic memory that can be changed via a press of a button or tied to the drivers key….. eg with two keys husband and wife can open the car and find the seats automatically set up to their liking. Rear seat space seemed very good and getting in and out was fairly easy for a coupe. The front cabin area had plenty of storage pockets and spaces and power connections for changing mobile phones or other devices. The M3 also comes with some extra ambient lighting which gives you interior and exterior LED lighting from doors and cabin - a nice little addition. The boot/trunk space is reasonable and the rear seats can fold down to allow larger loads.

Technology - the new M3 will have you playing with settings and buttons for ages...

M cars are usually renowned for their engineering prowess but the latest M3 models also come with their fair share of gadgets and gizmos. The iDrive system often gets lots of complaints in other reviews but I found it easy to navigate and frankly anyone that finds it difficult to use is probably the same sort of person that can't programme a video recorder! iDrive comes with a big central dash mounted display screen that covers most day to day functions with sections for entertainment (radio, cd, iPod etc.), navigation, climate control, parking display, car settings and bluetooth connected phones.

The stereo seemed pretty good for a car in this price bracket although I don't know if it was the standard offering or a more costly premium option. If you want to use an iPod or other MP3 player the central armrest has a nice storage area with power and aux input for the stereo as standard, if you pay for the optional iPod integration kit you get to use the iDrive system to navigate playlists/tracks etc on the main display. As I always have my iPod on random play I'd just plug and play without bothering with the extra cost option.

The parking display gives a clear visual and audible indication of distance to objects and was easy to use. As I never use my phone while driving I didn't play with any of the Bluetooth functions so I'll give that section a miss. The navigation system is actually one of the better built in versions that I've tested, it was easy to set up and the display was clear and updated quickly, in busy areas you are also given live traffic information with the option to automatically reroute to avoid any delays. The car settings screens allow you to change default options such as the throttle (normal, sport or sport plus), steering feel, electronic dampers (optional) and DCT gearbox setup (if fitted) while also allowing you to configure the “M” steering wheel button. If you like your gadgets the new M3 will have you playing with settings and buttons for ages and allows a huge range of setups to suit any driver and road condition….. just the sort of configurability I like in a car.

On the road - If you can't hear the V8 under the bonnet you may as well be driving a 4 pot diesel!

The M3 starts up with a small blast of revs and then settles into a slightly rough sounding idle. The 414bhp V8 sounds quite tame when cruising at low speeds and has less character than the V8 in the Audi RS4. At normal driving speeds the noises coming from the engine and exhaust are not that obvious in the cabin - in fact I was a little disappointed as I prefer a bit more volume. If you can't hear the V8 under the bonnet you may as well be driving a 4 pot diesel!

The M3 has a “dynamic” rev counter which from cold shows a lower rev limit on the dial. As the engine warms up the orange (warning) and red (danger) rev bands move up the dial until the 8400rpm redline is available. The big difference that I noticed between the M3 and RS4 is the way the BMW engine revs - a prod of the throttle pedal results in instant acceleration almost anywhere in the wide rev range and the willingness to rev up to the redline is massively impressive, the RS4 responsiveness is lazy by comparison. I drove the car entirely in Sport Plus mode which gives the sharpest throttle response, some may find this mode too jerky but it was fine for me. The electronic damper control system (EDC) is not something I would pay extra for, mainly because the three different modes didn't feel that different to me. In the default setting the ride felt firm while the sportiest setting felt slightly more firm. Basically I'd want a soft setting for cruising, a normal firm setting for day to day driving and a very firm setting for balls to the walls spirited driving…. For me the optional (and not cheap) EDC didn't offer that so I wouldn't bother with it as the M Divisions standard suspension setup is probably good enough for me.

...the car allowed the tail to slip round in a nice large controlled slide before powering up the road with the driver grinning from ear to ear!

Of particular note is the well judged traction/stability control systems in the M3. With DSC turned on, most wheel spin and lateral slip is quietly and unobtrusively cut back, while in the “M Dynamic” mode a large degree of tyre slip and tail sliding is allowed, before the system just as smoothly reigns in the control. On one sharp corner that I know well the car allowed the tail to slip round in a nice large controlled slide before powering up the road with the driver grinning from ear to ear! From a standing start my Performance Box measuring gear showed 0-62mph in 4.9sec (0.1sec slower than BMWs figures) with an impressively quick 30-70mph time of 3.7sec (the Aston Martin DB9 I reviewed recently did the same in 4.2sec). Handling wise the coupe hides its size and weight extremely well with a very sharp turn in, minimal body roll (EDC may have been helping here?) and good feel through the steering wheel, everything seemed to flow together in a way that gives the driver the confidence to push as hard as most would dare. The gearbox was ok but not what I would describe great….. The throw between gears is fairly long and overall I felt the transmission was not as good as I'd hoped. The brakes on the other hand felt very very good! The pedal responded progressively with speed being shed rapidly due to the huge composite brake discs and wide profile grippy tyres….. no complaints there!

The last thing to say on the driving experience is that while the sound at normal speeds is disappointing the M3 delivers when you start to push harder and harder. Once you pass 4000rpm with a wide open throttle the engine and exhaust notes combine and build in volume offering a thrilling hard edged sound. By the time you near the rev limit and slot in the next gear, the sound is hard to describe! Compared to the RS4s old school throbbing V8 soundtrack, the M3 is far more high tech/racecar/industrial in its sound.

Would I buy one?

Yes. In fact I have… As much as I liked the coupe I actually ended up ordering the new M3 Convertible (due for delivery Sept 2008). It's not as quick as the coupe and it won't handle as well, but with the roof down the sound of the V8 will be even better! I have always preferred a manual gearbox but the new BMW dual clutch M-DCT system was tempting enough for me to take a risk and order one. A full review will follow once the car arrives later in the year.

Comments (28)

PhantomPorsche 29.05.2008
Great job on the review, it was a great piece of work with every detail i can think of. I hope you enjoy your M3 and wish you the best of luck in September. The video was good, especially with the engine sound at redline. I have to agree with you i dont like the red. Oh, and what color is your convirtible be in?

Wads 01.06.2008
I've gone for Space Grey paint, 18" wheels and dark red leather interior.... I can't find a real picture of the exact combination on the convertible but the two pics from the online BMW design tool are ok: http://www.m3post.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=153&pictureid=8 44 http://www.m3post.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=153&pictureid=8 45

FastestLaps 01.06.2008
Great, impressive and extensive review with incredible attention to detail and, as always, with some funny excerpts that made me smile! I just wanted to add that, no matter what the color is, M3 is not only powerful car but also very good looking. It is not as aggressive as Nissan GT-R or iconic as 997 Turbo/Carrera but despite being a lot cheaper car and not considered a supercar, E92 Coupe is indeed a beautiful car. Good proportions, smooth, classic lines and a lot more elegance than current 5-series have.

Wads 02.06.2008
Links don't work to well from the comments.... try this if the other pics don't work.... http://www.bimmerpost.com/forums/bpgarage.php?do=view&id=2904

FastestLaps 03.06.2008
"Links don't work to well from the comments.... " Sorry about that! Now they work beautifully.

Wads 03.06.2008
thanks! is there something I'm doing wrong when posting a url link?

FastestLaps 03.06.2008
No. Certainly wasn't your fault. There was software error in hyperlink generation and text processing. Now all the links will automatically be click-able and won't contain errors.

Wads 03.06.2008
Cool!

A156 03.06.2008
I wish i had one...Great review for a great car :-) On cruising, is it better than Brera?

A156 03.06.2008
I mean more comfortable.

PhantomPorsche 03.06.2008
I have seen the car on the bimmer website and i have to say your car is going to be one beauty.

Wads 04.06.2008
A156..... yes the M3 is much more comfortable than the Alfa Brera. The seating positions are more adjustable and you have much more space..... the Brera is very nice but the interior is too small for normal sized people.

Anonymous 04.06.2008
soo you're assuming that Italians are not normal sized people....

Anonymous 04.06.2008
I don't think he's assuming a thing, have you ever seen Brera's interior?

A156 05.06.2008
M3 is more "sportcar" than brera which is more like "cruiser". Being more comfortable in a trip is an achievement for BMW (or a mistake for Alfa). I love Alfa Romeo, I own a 156, but the Italians have to do more than making beautiful cars. Alfa must be back on the top!

Wads 05.06.2008
Not suggesting that Italians are small just that anyone over 5ft 11" tall will struggle to fit in the Brera comfortably...... my head was touching the roof while in the drivers seat..... the back was so small I didn't even attempt to squeeze in to try but adults would not be happy for more than a few miles..... kids would love it!

FastestLaps 05.06.2008
Actually, it is obvious (if you have ever been in Italy) that Italians in average are smaller when compared to Swedes, Finns, Latvians or any other northern/sub-northern nation. That's just the way it is - we have to be big and fat if we want to survive these cold winters! :D ... Of course, bigger doesn't mean better. Especially when you have to fit yourself in a car like Fiat Cinquecento!

Anonymous 11.06.2008
how did you manage to get to test it for 3 days?

Wads 11.06.2008
I asked very nicely!

Anonymous 17.06.2008
cant wait for the csl with a 500lbs weight loss..its gonna make the old csl look like a hyundai..lol

Wads 17.06.2008
BMW insiders say there won't be a new M3 CSL..... if they do make one they won't be able to shave off 500lbs..... maybe 200lbs?

Anonymous 17.06.2008
MY insiders;) say they will be an csl that will shave 500. but i guess different sources say different things..

Anonymous 30.06.2008
this is one of my fav cars everrr, but what does everybody else drive?..i got me a hyundai..(wait for it....)...Tiburon...wheeew best hyundai out....well it was befo the genesis..

Wads 16.07.2008
Looks like the CSL is due to be released in 2010 and should have around 470bhp and weigh 100kg less than the E92 M3 Coupe. This is cut and pasted from Motor Authority: "Since the new E90 series BMW M3 was revealed at the Frankfurt Auto Show last year, true BMW enthusiasts have been intrigued, but waiting for the CSL to come along. Standing for Coupe, Sport, Lightweight, those three letters name the most track-focused and pure driver’s cars BMW has to offer. News of the new model is beginning to leak out, with reports claiming it will be on sale by the beginning of 2010. As the name suggests, saving weight is the focus of the M3 CSL’s performance regime. Carbon fiber and carbon fiber reinforced plastic are used extensively to achieve the goal of shaving 100kg from the base car. From the front fascia to the roof to the rear diffuser, center console and door panels, the CSL has spared almost no expense in its quest to achieve lightness. Even the radio, air conditioning, navigation and heated seats, among other optional accoutrement deemed unnecessary, have been deleted to save weight. Light weight isn’t the only thing that separates the CSL from its standard M3 cousins, however. A fully reworked suspension, a 50hp (37kW) increase to nearly 470hp (350kW), and stickier tires on special wheels all combine to offer real-world performance improvements. According to Auto Zeitung, Nurburgring Nordschleife lap times around 7 minutes, 45 seconds should be expected, and the price should slip in just below the €90,000 ($143,000) mark. All of these tweaks add up on paper, too, with expected acceleration times of 4.5 seconds for the 0-100km/h (62mph) dash and a top speed around 300km/h (186mph). The last BMW M3 CSL was built in a limited run of just 1,400 cars between 2002 and 2004. Such tiny numbers make the CSL an exclusive offering, and only the most dedicated opt for the extra expense and somewhat harsher and noisier ride characteristics of the car."

Anonymous 12.08.2008
Good choice! I picked up my M3 convertible last month in Munich and have had an ear-to-ear grin ever since. The sound of the V8 with the top down is incredible and is actually still getting better. Not too sure if BMW still places those speed limiters because I got it up to 175 mph the other day. And with the top down there's very little noise at speeds of 155 mph (with the wind deflector obviously). Only problem I see with the car is that the high revving is so addictive fuel consumption really suffers.

Wads 12.08.2008
Thanks not long to wait now as I pick mine up on the 1st of September. They had a good feature on the vert last night on Fifth Gear..... sounded fantastic on track.

FastestLaps 12.08.2008
Wait a minute! Fifth Gear is back? I guess I have missed something...

Wads 12.08.2008
Yep check your "Submit article" inbox ;-)

Add your comment

1. Your name
2. Comment
Enter (verification)

Which is faster?

Click here to compare two cars using the fastestlaps.com database!
Best known cars
•  Audi R8 (27)
•  Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (26)
•  BMW M3 (E92) (23)
•  Porsche 997 Turbo (21)
•  Porsche Cayman S (21)
•  Mazda RX-8 (19)
•  BMW M5 (E60) (18)
•  Nissan 350Z (283bhp) (17)
•  Nissan GT-R (17)
•  Audi RS4 (B7) (15)
•  Porsche 997 Carrera S (15)
•  Dodge Viper SRT-10 (15)
Most popular race tracks
•  Autozeitung test track (424)
•  Hockenheim Short (396)
•  Nordschleife (196)
•  Tsukuba (154)
•  Vairano Handling Course (123)
•  Oschersleben (117)
•  Top Gear Track (108)
•  Serres Racing Circuit (85)
•  Bedford Autodrome West Circuit (pre 06/2008) (78)
•  Motovision handling course (52)
•  Rockingham (50)
•  Balocco (48)

Add a car  |  Add lap time (c) Fastestlaps.com 2006-2007 2501 fastest lap times from 1263 greatest cars in the world.
Unregistered users online: 8
RSS Feed