| FastestLaps |
15.12.2007 |
 |
I really really doubt if it will ever be released. The prototype looks cheap. A
single nob on Veyron's dash costs more than the whole development of that weird
looking prototype. I wonder how reliable it will be at 1800 hp. And how will it
behave on road. Is is planned to be awd or rwd? |
|
| labeeshment |
16.12.2007 |
| they probably call it "hyper"car because it will only appear in hypertext...just
as the previous vector from early 90's is a matter of search "engines"
performance! and my opinion is that 90's design was genuine and impressive, this
prototype looks no more than "cheap"! |
|
| Anonymous |
16.12.2007 |
| WTF is that? another ultimate Aero with million hp and zero appeal. |
|
| Anonymous |
17.12.2007 |
| so...I'm the only oen that likes it? |
|
| FastestLaps |
18.12.2007 |
|
I hope you are not the only person interested in it because then they (Vector
Motors) will surely fail again. |
|
| Anonymous |
18.12.2007 |
| the fact is, the Veyron is a luxury car. it's a car for old men who waunt to
flaunt their money. i see no passion or flair in it's design.... It's like they
said "lets take an old man's car, and throw a giant engine in"
that's why i hate the Veyron. and why i rather like this. |
|
| No-Anonymous |
18.12.2007 |
| Veyron, you say, is old man's car. But how about others? What, do you think, is
a "Young man's car"? 400k USD Vector hypercar? Tell me how long it takes for
average person living in average economical and political scenario to earn
enough money legally to make 400k waste for that toy? All the expensive stuff is
more or less for old and middle aged men. Young men's car is 10 years old "hot
hatch" for couple hundred dollars..... |
|
| Anonymous |
24.01.2008 |
| "Tell me how long it takes for average person living in average economical and
political scenario to earn enough money legally to make 400k waste for that
toy?"
Ok, by the same logic, how much longer would it take to earn enough to aquire
the Veyron? To save up over a million US would take a lifetime for an average
bloke, so reaching 400K US comes sooner, hence its a younger man's car! (HEh
heh, I'm just throwing around some ideas for fun, no harm intended!) :D |
|
| Anonymous |
04.02.2008 |
| It'll have to be awd and weigh no less than 3000lbs, or itll be another
uncontrollable beast. the numbers are almost as crazy as the 1000+hp twin turbo
flat twelve porsche they built in the sixties, the series number escapes me,and
that was hard for the pros to control! other than these little complaints, i
like it and hope it does come to fruition. |
|
| rice |
25.04.2008 |
| is it just me or does anyone else thinks cars are gettin to be a lil tooo
powerful? |
|
| PhantomPorsche |
26.04.2008 |
 |
I think your right but 220 mph would be great with great handling thats all I
need 1850 too much. |
|
| rice |
26.04.2008 |
| yeah i dont mind if a car goes 220 but i think that atleast right know a cars hp
should be limited to about 1005 or atleast to 1200 ie ssc..lol but only for a
couple of years than they should raise it because 1850...thats unheard of im
mean damn...lol im happy givin this car 750. |
|
| Anonymous |
28.04.2008 |
| has this turned into the pipe and slippers page? how can any power be too much?
admittedly, we can't do 275mph legally, but wouldn't it be nice to get to 60 in
under 2 seconds?
|
|
| Anonymous |
12.05.2008 |
| im happy with gettin to 60 in 4 secs and i agree with rice an pp cars these days
ARE gettin too be a bit too powerful pretty soon 1/4 times wont be here itll be
2 miles in 4 damn seconds..lol this car would be fine with 625 bhp in ma
opinion.. |
|
